Fuller N J, Sawyer M B, Elia M
MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994 Jul;18(7):503-12.
The objective of this study was to apply a three-component model of body composition to a group of obese women in order to (a) establish the relative value of a number of readily available prediction equations by comparison of the extent of agreement between these predictions and body composition estimated by the model and other reference methods and (b) evaluate density and hydration of fat-free mass. Estimation of body composition was carried out by reference methods and prediction equations and the usefulness of these prediction equations for application specifically to obese women was evaluated. The subjects were 15 obese, otherwise healthy, Caucasian women (body mass index > 30kg/m2 and body fat > 40% of body weight, as originally determined using densitometry). Body composition was estimated using three established reference methods (deuterium dilution which primarily measures total body water, densitometry for body fat and fat-free mass and total body potassium) and the three component model constructed from deuterium dilution and densitometry. Density and hydration fraction of the fat-free mass were calculated from appropriate values obtained as integral parts of the three-component model. In addition, body composition was predicted from various prediction equations incorporating weight and height (some of which include a factor for age), from a number of prediction equations utilizing different terms involving the same whole-body bio-electrical impedance measurement and from measurements of skinfold thickness and near infrared interactance. The extent of agreement between methods was assessed using bias and 95% limits of agreement. Mean density of fat-free mass was found to be 1.104 kg/l (s.d. 0.006kg/l) with a range of 1.093 to 1.117 kg/l, and mean hydration fraction was 0.712 (s.d. 0.016) with a range of hydration from 68.2% to 75.1% (all values were calculated from the three-component model). In general, the reference methods (densitometry, deuterium dilution, the three-component model and total body potassium) demonstrated better agreement with each other than with the prediction methods or equations. In these obese women, skinfold thickness measurements are apparently less reliable (large bias and 95% limits of agreement) than in the lean subjects of a variety of other studies. A majority of interpretations of weight and height measurements and predictions incorporating impedance/resistance measurements are apparently not applicable to this group of obese women, due to large values for both bias and 95% limits of agreement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本研究的目的是将身体成分的三成分模型应用于一组肥胖女性,以便:(a) 通过比较这些预测与模型及其他参考方法估计的身体成分之间的一致程度,确定一些易于获得的预测方程的相对价值;(b) 评估去脂体重的密度和水合作用。通过参考方法和预测方程对身体成分进行估计,并评估这些预测方程专门应用于肥胖女性的实用性。研究对象为15名肥胖但其他方面健康的白人女性(体重指数>30kg/m2且体脂>体重的40%,最初使用密度测定法确定)。使用三种既定的参考方法(主要测量总体水的氘稀释法、用于测量体脂和去脂体重及总体钾的密度测定法)以及由氘稀释法和密度测定法构建的三成分模型来估计身体成分。根据作为三成分模型组成部分获得的适当值计算去脂体重的密度和水合分数。此外,根据包含体重和身高的各种预测方程(其中一些包括年龄因素)、利用涉及相同全身生物电阻抗测量的不同项的多个预测方程以及皮褶厚度和近红外相互作用测量来预测身体成分。使用偏差和95%一致性界限评估方法之间的一致程度。发现去脂体重的平均密度为1.104kg/l(标准差0.006kg/l),范围为1.093至1.117kg/l,平均水合分数为0.712(标准差0.016),水合范围为68.2%至75.1%(所有值均根据三成分模型计算)。一般来说,参考方法(密度测定法、氘稀释法、三成分模型和总体钾)之间的一致性比与预测方法或方程之间的一致性更好。在这些肥胖女性中,皮褶厚度测量显然比其他各种研究中的瘦人受试者更不可靠(偏差大且95%一致性界限宽)。由于偏差值和95%一致性界限都很大,大多数对体重和身高测量以及包含阻抗/电阻测量的预测的解释显然不适用于这组肥胖女性。(摘要截短至400字)