• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于离婚的女性主义视角。

A feminist perspective on divorce.

作者信息

Carbone J R

机构信息

Santa Clara University School of Law.

出版信息

Future Child. 1994 Spring;4(1):183-209.

PMID:7922279
Abstract

Feminist perspectives on divorce proceed from the ways in which women's positions at divorce systematically differ from men's positions. Although there has been a large-scale increase in mothers' labor force participation, there has been no corresponding increase in fathers' domestic contributions, and women continue to bear the overwhelming responsibility for child rearing. In substantial part because of this division of labor within the family, divorcing women, on average, face bleaker financial prospects and enjoy closer emotional ties to their children than do their former husbands. Existing divorce law, with its emphasis on each party's self-sufficiency, limited provision for child support, and gender-neutral custody principles, does not fully recognize or address these differences. Feminists differ in the responses they propose to these issues. "Liberal feminists" believe that women's domestic responsibilities will inevitably place them at a disadvantage and favor policies that encourage men to assume a proportionate share of family responsibilities. "Cultural feminists," or "feminists of difference," believe that it is not the fact that women care for children but that child rearing is so undervalued which is the source of the problem. "Radical feminists" believe that it is impossible to know whether women's involvement in child rearing would differ from men's in a different society and focus on the ways in which marriage and work force policies perpetuate male dominance. All agree, however, that existing law contributes to the relative impoverishment of many women and children and that, even when the rules purport to be gender-neutral, they are administered in systematically biased ways.

摘要

女性主义对于离婚的观点源于女性在离婚时的处境与男性的处境存在系统性差异这一事实。尽管母亲参与劳动力市场的比例大幅上升,但父亲在家庭中的贡献却没有相应增加,女性仍然承担着育儿的绝大部分责任。很大程度上由于家庭内部的这种劳动分工,平均而言,离婚女性面临的经济前景比前夫更为黯淡,并且与子女的情感联系也更为紧密。现行离婚法强调双方的自给自足,对子女抚养的规定有限,且采用性别中立的监护原则,没有充分认识或解决这些差异。女性主义者对这些问题提出的应对措施各不相同。“自由女性主义者”认为,女性的家庭责任不可避免地会使她们处于不利地位,并支持鼓励男性承担相应家庭责任的政策。“文化女性主义者”或“差异女性主义者”认为,问题的根源不在于女性照顾孩子这一事实,而在于育儿被严重低估。“激进女性主义者”认为,在一个不同的社会中,无法知道女性参与育儿的情况是否会与男性不同,并关注婚姻和劳动力政策使男性主导地位延续的方式。然而,所有人都同意,现行法律导致许多妇女和儿童相对贫困,而且即使这些规则声称是性别中立的,它们在实施过程中也存在系统性的偏见。

相似文献

1
A feminist perspective on divorce.关于离婚的女性主义视角。
Future Child. 1994 Spring;4(1):183-209.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
Recommendation 1074 on family policy, 3 May 1988.1988年5月3日关于家庭政策的第1074号建议。
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1988;15:83, 471-4.
4
The role of the father after divorce.离婚后父亲的角色。
Future Child. 1994 Spring;4(1):210-35.
5
Women's status and child survival in West Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚西爪哇省的妇女地位与儿童生存状况
Asia Pac Popul J. 1991 Mar;6(1):3-24.
6
Financial impact of divorce on children and their families.离婚对孩子及其家庭的经济影响。
Future Child. 1994 Spring;4(1):63-83.
7
Consequences of marital dissolution for children.婚姻解体对孩子的影响。
Annu Rev Sociol. 1994;20:235-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001315.
8
China's Marriage Law: a model for family responsibilities and relationships.中国婚姻法:家庭责任与关系的典范。
Fam Process. 1982 Dec;21(4):477-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1982.00477.x.
9
U.S. women at work.美国职业女性。
Popul Bull. 1981 May;36(2):1-45.
10
Historical perspective and current trends in the legal process of divorce.离婚法律程序的历史视角与当前趋势。
Future Child. 1994 Spring;4(1):44-62.