Cole M G, Primeau F J, Bailey R F, Bonnycastle M J, Masciarelli F, Engelsmann F, Pepin M J, Ducic D
Department of Psychiatry, St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montreal, Que.
CMAJ. 1994 Oct 1;151(7):965-70.
To assess a systematic intervention in cases of delirium in elderly inpatients.
Randomized, controlled trial.
University-affiliated, primary acute care hospital.
Patients aged 75 years or over admitted to the medical department. They were screened within 24 hours after admission, and 88 patients with delirium (according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third revised edition) were detected and enrolled in the trial. The patients were randomly allocated to the treatment group (42) or the control group (46); all were followed up until the end of the study.
Patients were assessed on enrolment and 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks later. Those in the treatment group received a consultation by a geriatric internist or psychiatrist and follow-up by a liaison nurse. Those in the control group received regular medical care.
Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), Crichton Geriatric Behavioural Rating Scale (CGBRS), use of restraints, length of hospital stay, discharge to a setting providing more care than was needed before admission and mortality rate.
Two weeks after admission, patients in the treatment group showed an improvement in their mean SPMSQ scores, from 8.2 (standard deviation [SD] 1.9) to 7.9 (SD 2.5), whereas the control group showed a deterioration, from 8.4 (SD 1.7) to 9.1 (SD 1.1); this difference had disappeared by the end of the 8-week period (p < 0.05). Mean CGBRS scores were higher in the treatment group (32.0 [SD 8.6]) than the control group (28.5 [SD 9.4]) on enrolment and had improved more markedly by the end of the 8-week period (to 23.9 [SD 7.8] v. 25.0 [SD 7.0], p = 0.06). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in use of restraints, length of hospital stay, discharge to a setting providing more care than was needed before admission or mortality rate.
The beneficial effects of systematic detection and intervention in cases of delirium in elderly inpatients were small.
评估对老年住院患者谵妄病例的系统干预措施。
随机对照试验。
大学附属医院,初级急症护理医院。
医学科收治的75岁及以上患者。入院后24小时内对他们进行筛查,检测出88例谵妄患者(根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版标准)并纳入试验。患者被随机分配至治疗组(42例)或对照组(46例);所有患者均随访至研究结束。
患者在入组时以及之后1、2、4和8周接受评估。治疗组患者接受老年内科医生或精神科医生的会诊,并由联络护士进行随访。对照组患者接受常规医疗护理。
简易便携式精神状态问卷(SPMSQ)、克里顿老年行为评定量表(CGBRS)、约束措施的使用情况、住院时间、出院后转至比入院前所需护理更多的机构以及死亡率。
入院两周后,治疗组患者的平均SPMSQ评分有所改善,从8.2(标准差[SD]1.9)降至7.9(SD 2.5),而对照组则出现恶化,从8.4(SD 1.7)升至9.1(SD 1.1);8周结束时这种差异消失(p<0.05)。入组时治疗组的平均CGBRS评分(32.0[SD 8.6])高于对照组(28.5[SD 9.4]),8周结束时改善更为明显(分别为23.9[SD 7.8]和25.0[SD 7.0],p = 0.06)。两组在约束措施的使用、住院时间、出院后转至比入院前所需护理更多的机构或死亡率方面无统计学显著差异。
对老年住院患者谵妄病例进行系统检测和干预的益处较小。