Robertson E N, Hull J M, Verbeek A M, Booij L H
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1994;9:116-21.
The aim of this study was to compare, in 30 patients, the pharmacodynamics of equipotent intubating doses of rocuronium and vecuronium and to compare their effects on heart rate, arterial pressure and intra-ocular pressure under steady state propofol anaesthesia. Baseline readings of heart rate and arterial pressure, using a Dinamap, and intra-ocular pressure, using a Tonopen, were made after induction of anaesthesia. The effects of the administration of the relaxants on these parameters were measured, recorded and compared. Rocuronium had a faster onset time than vecuronium, but had a similar duration of action. Vecuronium had no significant cardiovascular effects. Rocuronium caused a rise in mean arterial pressure (10-15%) and a slight rise in heart rate (5-10%). Both vecuronium and rocuronium caused similar falls in intra-ocular pressure. With its rapid onset time and lack of intra-ocular pressure effects, rocuronium is perhaps the relaxant of choice in patients with penetrating eye injuries requiring emergency endotracheal anaesthesia where a longer-acting relaxant is not contraindicated.
本研究的目的是比较30例患者中,等效插管剂量的罗库溴铵和维库溴铵的药效学,并比较它们在稳态丙泊酚麻醉下对心率、动脉压和眼压的影响。麻醉诱导后,使用Dinamap测量心率和动脉压的基线读数,使用眼压计测量眼压。测量、记录并比较了给予肌松药对这些参数的影响。罗库溴铵的起效时间比维库溴铵快,但作用持续时间相似。维库溴铵无显著心血管效应。罗库溴铵导致平均动脉压升高(10%-15%),心率略有升高(5%-10%)。维库溴铵和罗库溴铵均可使眼压出现类似程度的下降。鉴于罗库溴铵起效迅速且对眼压无影响,对于需要紧急气管内麻醉且无长效肌松药禁忌证的穿透性眼外伤患者而言,罗库溴铵或许是首选的肌松药。