Dundas I
Fam Process. 1994 Jun;33(2):191-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00191.x.
Olson's Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scales (FACES III) and Beavers' Self-report Family Inventory (SFI) were administered to 177 young Norwegian adults. Three questions were raised: (1) do the two-factor structure and curvilinear hypothesis of Olson's model of family functioning find support cross-culturally; (2) does curvilinearity depend on whether families of origin or procreation are described; and (3) does the data analytic technique dictate the results. In 1985, in their manual, Olson and his associates proposed the use of Distance from Center (DFC) scores to test the curvilinear hypothesis, a procedure that presupposes orthogonality between the dimensions of Cohesion and Adaptability, which was not found in several other samples nor in the present study. Using DFC scores, the curvilinear hypothesis received moderate support only when families of origin were described. A polynomic regression analysis gave clear evidence, however, of a linear relationship between the FACES dimensions and SFI Health Scores for both families of origin and families of procreation. The findings suggest that respondents do not have an implicit bipolar model of cohesion and adaptability.
奥尔森家庭适应性与凝聚力量表(第三版)(FACES III)和比弗斯家庭自评量表(SFI)被施用于177名年轻的挪威成年人。提出了三个问题:(1)奥尔森家庭功能模型的双因素结构和曲线假设在跨文化研究中是否得到支持;(2)曲线性是否取决于所描述的是原生家庭还是生育家庭;(3)数据分析技术是否决定结果。1985年,奥尔森及其同事在他们的手册中提议使用中心距离(DFC)分数来检验曲线假设,这一程序预先假定了凝聚力和适应性维度之间的正交性,但在其他几个样本以及本研究中均未发现这种正交性。使用DFC分数时,曲线假设仅在描述原生家庭时得到了适度支持。然而,多项式回归分析明确显示,无论是原生家庭还是生育家庭,FACES维度与SFI健康分数之间都存在线性关系。研究结果表明,受访者并没有凝聚力和适应性的隐含双极模型。