Becker H, Hartmann U
Abt. Klinische Psychiatrie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1994 Aug;62(8):290-305. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999060.
Referring to the recent debate on how to describe and classify "transsexual phenomena" according to psychopathological and diagnostic criteria and the necessary definition of standards of care, this investigation is intended as a clinically oriented contribution to the study of gender identity disorders. Beside a literature review to outline the different theoretical positions, several case reports are presented to illustrate and analyze the variety and complexity of conditions which are underlying or concomitant to the desire for a sex change. This study focuses on the need for more careful diagnostic considerations and scrupulous follow-up of patients presenting with the conviction of wrong sex assignment. Although it seems reasonable to "detotalize" transsexualism, the authors plead for the adherence to a clinically oriented approach to this issue. They disagree with arguments to abandon a "nosomorphic view" or with notions that regard transsexualism as a "minority which has been pathologized". In order to match demands properly and to give adequate advice it appears necessary to improve general knowledge and specific therapeutic competence in the field of gender identity disorders.
关于近期围绕如何依据精神病理学和诊断标准来描述及分类“易性现象”以及护理标准的必要定义展开的辩论,本调查旨在为性别认同障碍的研究提供一份以临床为导向的贡献。除了进行文献综述以概述不同的理论立场外,还呈现了几例病例报告,以阐释和分析性别转换愿望背后或与之相伴的各种情况的多样性和复杂性。本研究着重强调,对于坚信自己性别被错误分配的患者,需要进行更审慎的诊断考量和严格的随访。尽管将易性癖“去总体化”似乎有其合理性,但作者主张坚持以临床为导向的方法来处理这一问题。他们不同意放弃“疾病形态学观点”的论点,也不同意将易性癖视为“被病理化的少数群体”的观点。为了恰当地满足需求并提供充分的建议,似乎有必要提高性别认同障碍领域的一般知识和特定治疗能力。