Suppr超能文献

直肠癌前切除术中路吻合器吻合与手工缝合吻合的比较。

A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum.

作者信息

Sarker S K, Chaudhry R, Sinha V K

机构信息

Department of surgery, Army Research & Referral Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Cancer. 1994 Jun;31(2):133-7.

PMID:7927447
Abstract

The merits of stapled versus hand sewn anastomosis were evaluated in a prospective randomized study of 60 patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. The analysed factors included the time required for construction of anastomosis, post operative complications, local recurrence, disease free state and survival. Hand sewn anastomosis was performed in two layers with 3/0 silk in 30 cases and the stapled anastomosis with EEA staplers in 30 cases. The anastomosis time averaged 24 minutes in the suture group and 16 minutes in the stapling group. Five post-operative complications occurred in each group. Six patients of the hand sewn group developed local recurrence as a first sign of treatment failure compared to four patients in the stapled group. The average time of study was 41 months. No significant difference was found in the overall survival pattern of the two groups.

摘要

在一项对60例接受直肠癌切除术患者的前瞻性随机研究中,评估了吻合器吻合与手工缝合吻合的优缺点。分析的因素包括吻合口构建所需时间、术后并发症、局部复发、无病状态和生存率。30例采用3/0丝线分两层进行手工缝合吻合,30例采用EEA吻合器进行吻合器吻合。缝合组吻合时间平均为24分钟,吻合器组为16分钟。每组均发生5例术后并发症。手工缝合组有6例患者出现局部复发,作为治疗失败的首发征象,而吻合器组为4例。研究的平均时间为41个月。两组的总生存模式未发现显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验