Suppr超能文献

腹膜下结直肠吻合术:手工缝合与圆形吻合器吻合。一项对照临床试验。法国外科研究协会

Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.

作者信息

Fingerhut A, Elhadad A, Hay J M, Lacaine F, Flamant Y

机构信息

French Associations for Surgical Research, Bois-Colombes.

出版信息

Surgery. 1994 Sep;116(3):484-90.

PMID:8079178
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disagreement continues among several studies as to the relative advantages and disadvantages of stapled versus sutured colorectal anastomoses.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients (48 men and 65 women, mean age: 67 +/- 12 years) were randomized to either hand-sewn (n = 59) or stapled (n = 54) infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis. Both groups had similar patient demographics except that fewer patients (4 versus 15) had chronic disease (p < 0.02) and were undergoing side-to-end (11 versus 39) and more patients were undergoing end-to-end (37 versus 20) anastomosis in the stapled group (p < 0.001).

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 6% (7 of 113 patients), with no difference found between the two types of anastomosis. Fewer anastomotic leaks occurred in the stapled group (11 versus 7), with an a posteriori gamma error of 11%, whereas the other early postoperative complications occurred with similar frequency in the two groups. Nine mishaps occurred in the stapled group. Stapled anastomoses took less time (median, 42 versus 30 minutes) to perform (p < 0.02). At 8 months, two strictures occurred in the hand-sewn group (n = 52) compared with eight strictures in the stapled group (n = 50) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to prove that lower anastomosis can be achieved with the stapling device. Routine or regular use of stapling instruments for infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis cannot be advocated because of higher incidence of mishaps and strictures, even though the operation takes less time to perform and anastomotic leakage occurs less often.

摘要

背景

关于吻合器与缝合的结直肠吻合术的相对优缺点,多项研究仍存在分歧。

方法

113例连续患者(48例男性和65例女性,平均年龄:67±12岁)被随机分为手工缝合(n = 59)或吻合器(n = 54)行腹膜下结直肠吻合术。两组患者的人口统计学特征相似,但吻合器组慢性病患者较少(4例对15例,p < 0.02),且端侧吻合较少(11例对39例),而行端端吻合的患者较多(37例对20例)(p < 0.001)。

结果

总死亡率为6%(113例患者中的7例),两种吻合方式之间未发现差异。吻合器组吻合口漏较少(11例对7例),事后γ误差为11%,而两组术后其他早期并发症的发生率相似。吻合器组发生了9起不良事件。吻合器吻合所需时间较少(中位数,42分钟对30分钟)(p < 0.02)。8个月时,手工缝合组(n = 52)出现2例狭窄,而吻合器组(n = 50)出现8例狭窄(p < 0.001)。

结论

无法证明使用吻合器能实现更低的吻合口。不提倡常规或定期使用吻合器进行腹膜下结直肠吻合术,因为不良事件和狭窄的发生率较高,尽管手术时间较短且吻合口漏的发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验