选择和任务偏好对重度残疾成年人工作表现的影响。
The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.
作者信息
Bambara L M, Ager C, Koger F
机构信息
Department of Special Education, College of Education, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):555-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-555.
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of choice versus the assignment of tasks of varying preferences on the work engagement of adults with severe disabilities. The combined results of two experiments suggests that the relative preference for a task may be an important variable in the effectiveness of choice for some individuals.
摘要
我们评估了选择与分配不同偏好任务对重度残疾成年人工作投入度的影响。两项实验的综合结果表明，对某些个体而言，对任务的相对偏好可能是选择有效性的一个重要变量。
相似文献
1
The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.选择和任务偏好对重度残疾成年人工作表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):555-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-555.
2
Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.智障学生的首选课程活动与问题行为减少
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):493-504. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-493.
3
Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.在有和没有发育障碍的学龄前儿童中，选择刺激作为任务反应强化物对任务反应强化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):93-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-93.
4
Promoting stimulus control with textual prompts and performance feedback for persons with mild disabilities.通过文本提示和绩效反馈促进轻度残疾人士的刺激控制。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):477-89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-477.
5
The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.基本学习能力评估（ABLA）测试可预测发育障碍患者任务偏好的相对效果。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Jun;50(Pt 6):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00780.x.
6
Effects of part versus whole instructional strategies on skill acquisition and excess behavior.部分与整体教学策略对技能习得和过度行为的影响。
Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Jan;94(4):377-86.
7
Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.培训工作人员进行配对刺激偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Summer;35(2):209-11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-209.
8
Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps.自主选择工作与分配工作对重度残障人士工作表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):253-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-253.
9
Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.刺激选择偏好评估中低排名项目的进一步评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):105-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-105.
10
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
引用本文的文献
1
An Evaluation of Assistive Technology in Determining Job-Specific Preference for Adults With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities.评估辅助技术对自闭症和智力残疾成年人特定工作偏好的影响
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Aug 5;13(2):434-444. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00380-3. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Assessing Preferences for Animals in Children with Autism: A New Use for Video-Based Preference Assessment.评估自闭症儿童对动物的偏好：基于视频的偏好评估的新用途。
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Mar 10;4:29. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.
3
Using choice to increase on-task behavior in individuals with traumatic brain injury.运用选择来增加创伤性脑损伤患者的任务执行行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):261-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-261.
4
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
5
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
6
Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.由受试者与实验者选择的强化物对重度发育障碍个体行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):61-71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-61.
本文引用的文献
1
Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps.自主选择工作与分配工作对重度残障人士工作表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):253-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-253.
2
The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults.评估智障成年人职业前任务偏好程序的验证。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):153-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-153.
Zotero 插件