Norrby S R
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Lund, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 May;33 Suppl A:43-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.suppl_a.43.
The evaluation of new regimens for treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has often been unsatisfactory. A major reason has been the lack of internationally accepted guidelines for design and conduct of UTI trials. The introduction of new guidelines has largely overcome this problem. However, some problems remain, and this review especially addresses the problem of defining outcomes of treatment of UTI. New, somewhat controversial definitions of bacteriuria are well documented for various types of UTI, but have not been properly evaluated as end-points for defining bacteriological responses to treatment.
对治疗尿路感染(UTIs)新方案的评估往往不尽人意。一个主要原因是缺乏关于UTI试验设计和实施的国际公认指南。新指南的引入在很大程度上克服了这个问题。然而,一些问题仍然存在,本综述特别探讨了定义UTI治疗结果的问题。对于各种类型的UTI,关于菌尿症的新的、有些争议的定义有充分记录,但尚未作为定义治疗细菌学反应的终点进行适当评估。