Clemensen P, Christensen P, Norsk P, Grønlund J
Department of Research and Development, Innovision, Odense, Denmark.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Jun;76(6):2832-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.6.2832.
The feasibility of replacing a conventional mass spectrometer (MS) with a specially modified multicomponent (O2, CO2, Freon 22, and SF6) acoustic infrared and paramagnetic (IR/PM) gas analyzer in inert gas-rebreathing and metabolic gas exchange measurements has been investigated. Rebreathing variables were determined simultaneously with the MS and IR/PM analyzers in duplicate measurements at rest and during submaximal exercise in 10 subjects. The differences (means +/- SD, IR/PM - MS) were 0.028 +/- 0.048 liters [functional residual capacity (FRC)], 0.18 +/- 0.38 l/min [cardiac output (Qc)], -0.006 +/- 0.030 l/min [O2 consumption (VO2)], and -33 +/- 108 ml [combined lung tissue and capillary blood volume (Vti,c)]. The coefficients of variation on repeated estimates were 5.8% (FRC), 5.4% (Qc), 6.2% (VO2), and 17% (Vti,c) with the IR/PM analyzer and 5.9% (FRC), 4.2% (Qc), 5.0% (VO2), and 9.8% (Vti,c) with the MS. The differences (IR/PM - MS) obtained in mixed-expirate measurements were -0.006 +/- 0.020 l/min (VO2) and 0.020 +/- 0.021 l/min (CO2 production). Breath-by-breath estimates of VO2 and CO2 production with the IR/PM analyzer were, on average, 2.4 and 4.4% higher than the MS estimates, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the IR/PM gas analyzer, when appropriately modified, can substitute for a complex MS in a variety of noninvasive pulmonary gas exchange measurements.
研究了在惰性气体再呼吸和代谢气体交换测量中,用经过特殊改装的多组分(氧气、二氧化碳、氟利昂22和六氟化硫)声学红外和顺磁(IR/PM)气体分析仪替代传统质谱仪(MS)的可行性。在10名受试者静息和次最大运动时,使用MS和IR/PM分析仪同时进行重复测量,以确定再呼吸变量。差异(均值±标准差,IR/PM - MS)为0.028±0.048升[功能残气量(FRC)]、0.18±0.38升/分钟[心输出量(Qc)]、-0.006±0.030升/分钟[耗氧量(VO2)]和-33±108毫升[肺组织和毛细血管血容量总和(Vti,c)]。使用IR/PM分析仪时,重复估计的变异系数分别为5.8%(FRC)、5.4%(Qc)、6.2%(VO2)和17%(Vti,c),使用MS时分别为5.9%(FRC)、4.2%(Qc)、5.0%(VO2)和9.8%(Vti,c)。在混合呼出气体测量中获得的差异(IR/PM - MS)为-0.006±0.020升/分钟(VO2)和0.020±0.021升/分钟(二氧化碳产生量)。使用IR/PM分析仪逐次呼吸估计的VO2和二氧化碳产生量平均分别比MS估计值高2.4%和4.4%。我们的结果表明,经过适当改装的IR/PM气体分析仪可以在各种无创肺气体交换测量中替代复杂的MS。