Traynor M
Daphne Heald Research Unit, Royal College of Nursing, London, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):101-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010101.x.
This paper presents preliminary findings from research being carried out into how community nurses in three first-wave community trusts are responding to changes stemming from recent legislation. A Measure of Job Satisfaction was devised for the study for administration to the entire nursing workforce in the participating trusts and semi-structured interviews were carried out with managers at all levels in each of the trusts. This paper concentrates on the textual data arising from the study dealing with how nurses understood the values of managers and how managers viewed nurses' values. Nurses tended to express their beliefs about managers as a series of us-them oppositions while the comments of managers can be seen within a rational/irrational dualism. Some possible theoretical frameworks in which these texts can be further explored are briefly discussed, including Foucault's power/knowledge concept and the literature of 'colonization'.
本文展示了对首批三家社区信托机构中的社区护士如何应对近期立法带来的变化所开展研究的初步结果。为该研究设计了一项工作满意度衡量指标，用于对参与信托机构的全体护理人员进行管理，并对每个信托机构的各级管理人员进行了半结构化访谈。本文重点关注该研究产生的文本数据，这些数据涉及护士如何理解管理人员的价值观以及管理人员如何看待护士的价值观。护士倾向于将他们对管理人员的看法表达为一系列“我们”与“他们”的对立，而管理人员的评论则可在理性/非理性二元论的范畴内看待。本文简要讨论了一些可进一步探究这些文本的可能理论框架，包括福柯的权力/知识概念以及“殖民化”文献。
