• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于衡量护理决策中的协作与满意度的工具。

Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions.

作者信息

Baggs J G

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):176-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010176.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010176.x
PMID:7930118
Abstract

The psychometric assessment of a new instrument for measurement of the construct of nurse-physician collaboration in making specific patient care decisions. Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD), is reported. Content validity for the tool was supported by literature review, nurse and physician experts, and potential subjects. In a pilot study 58 neonatal intensive care nurses' and resident physicians' responses showed variance; alpha reliability of the collaboration questions was 0.95. Construct validity of the collaboration questions was supported by finding expected correlational patterns and by factor analysis revealing a single factor that explained 75% of the variance in collaboration. Further psychometric testing of the instrument is proposed, particularly in the context of substantive studies that would allow investigation of its association with patient outcomes.

摘要

报告了一种用于衡量护士与医生在做出特定患者护理决策时协作情况的新工具——护理决策协作与满意度(CSACD)的心理测量评估。该工具的内容效度得到了文献综述、护士和医生专家以及潜在受试者的支持。在一项试点研究中,58名新生儿重症监护护士和住院医师的回答显示出差异;协作问题的α信度为0.95。协作问题的结构效度通过发现预期的相关模式以及通过因子分析揭示一个解释了协作中75%方差的单一因子得到了支持。建议对该工具进行进一步的心理测量测试,特别是在实质性研究的背景下,这将有助于调查其与患者结局的关联。

相似文献

1
Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions.开发一种用于衡量护理决策中的协作与满意度的工具。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):176-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010176.x.
2
Nurse/physician collaboration: action research and the lessons learned.护士/医生协作:行动研究及经验教训
J Nurs Adm. 2001 May;31(5):223-32. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200105000-00002.
3
The nurse-nurse collaboration scale.护士-护士合作量表。
J Nurs Adm. 2010 Jan;40(1):17-25. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181c47cd6.
4
Use of the ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire (ICU N-P-Q): testing reliability and validity in neonatal intensive care units in Japan.《重症监护病房护士-医生问卷》(ICU N-P-Q)的应用:在日本新生儿重症监护病房进行信效度测试
BMJ Open. 2016 May 9;6(5):e010105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010105.
5
Collaboration between nurses and physicians in Europe.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Sep;21(9 Suppl):S388-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199309001-00057.
6
Managing the intensive care unit: physician-nurse collaboration.重症监护病房的管理:医生与护士的协作
Crit Care Med. 1993 Sep;21(9 Suppl):S389-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199309001-00058.
7
Nurse-physician collaboration and associations with perceived autonomy in Cypriot critical care nurses.塞浦路斯重症监护护士的护医协作及其与感知自主性的关联
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jan;22(1):29-39. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12126. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
A novel questionnaire to measure staff perception of end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit--development and psychometric testing.一种用于测量重症监护病房临终决策的员工感知的新问卷——开发和心理测量测试。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
9
Factors affecting Korean neonatal nurses' pain care: Psychometric evaluation of three instruments.影响韩国新生儿护士疼痛护理的因素:三种工具的心理测量评估
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019 Apr;16(2):125-135. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12219. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
Intensive care decisions about level of aggressiveness of care.
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Aug;18(4):345-55. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180408.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses Toward Interprofessional Collaboration: a Systematic Literature Review.医生和护士对跨专业协作的态度:一项系统文献综述
Mater Sociomed. 2025;37(1):64-73. doi: 10.5455/msm.2025.37.64-73.
2
Discussing expected long-term quality of life in the ICU: effect on experiences and outcomes of patients, family, and clinicians-a randomized clinical trial.探讨重症监护病房(ICU)中预期的长期生活质量:对患者、家属和临床医生的体验及结局的影响——一项随机临床试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;51(3):478-489. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07812-5. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Cluster randomized trial of a team communication training implementation strategy for depression screening in a pediatric healthcare system: a study protocol.
一项针对儿科医疗系统中抑郁症筛查的团队沟通培训实施策略的整群随机试验:研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 18;5(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00641-5.
4
Night Physician-Nurse Collaboration: Developing the Scale of Physicians' Difficulties and Exploring Related Factors in Acute Care Hospitals.夜间医生与护士协作:急性护理医院中医生困难程度量表的编制及相关因素探索
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jun 12;17:2831-2845. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S454578. eCollection 2024.
5
Association between the Quantity of Nurse-Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review.护士 - 医生跨专业协作数量与住院患者死亡率之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;21(4):494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040494.
6
Development and Validation of the Interprofessional Collaboration Practice Competency Scale (IPCPCS) for Clinical Nurses.临床护士跨专业协作实践能力量表(IPCPCS)的编制与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;12(7):806. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070806.
7
Perceptions of Quality of Interprofessional Collaboration, Staff Well-Being and Nonbeneficial Treatment: A Comparison between Nurses and Physicians in Intensive and Palliative Care.跨专业协作质量、员工福祉与非有益治疗的认知:重症与姑息治疗中护士与医生的比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):602. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060602.
8
Applying after-action reviews to child and family teams to improve mental health service linkage within child welfare services: a study protocol.将事后评估应用于儿童和家庭团队以改善儿童福利服务中的心理健康服务联系:一项研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Oct 5;4(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00479-3.
9
Assessment of interprofessional obstetric and midwifery care from the midwives' perspective using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS).从中助产士的角度,使用跨专业协作量表(ICS)评估跨专业产科和助产护理。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 22;14:1143110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143110. eCollection 2023.
10
Different perspectives of ethical climate and collaboration between ICU physicians and nurses.重症监护室医生与护士之间道德氛围及协作的不同视角。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 May;49(5):600-601. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07051-6. Epub 2023 Apr 8.