Turitto G, Ahuja R K, Caref E B, el-Sherif N
Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn 11203.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15;24(6):1523-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90149-x.
This study investigated prediction of arrhythmic events by the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) and programmed stimulation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Risk stratification in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy remains controversial.
Eighty patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography (both time-domain and spectral turbulence analysis) and programmed stimulation. All patients were followed up for a mean of 22 +/- 26 months.
Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced in 10 patients (13%), who all received amiodarone. The remaining 70 patients were followed up without antiarrhythmic therapy. Of the 80 patients, 15% had abnormal findings on the time-domain signal-averaged ECG, and 39% had abnormal findings on spectral turbulence analysis. Time-domain signal-averaged electrocardiography had a better predictive accuracy for induced ventricular tachycardia than spectral turbulence analysis (88% vs. 66%, p < 0.01). During follow-up, there were 9 arrhythmic events (5 sudden deaths, 4 spontaneous ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) and 10 nonsudden cardiac deaths. Cox regression analysis showed that no variables predicted arrhythmic events or total cardiac deaths. The 2-year actuarial survival free of arrhythmic events was similar in patients with or without abnormal findings on the signal-averaged ECG or induced ventricular tachycardia.
In patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, 1) there is a strong correlation between abnormal findings on the time-domain signal-averaged ECG and induced ventricular tachycardia, but both findings are uncommon; and 2) normal findings on the signal-averaged ECG, as well as failure to induce ventricular tachycardia, do not imply a benign outcome.
本研究调查了信号平均心电图(ECG)和程序刺激对非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者心律失常事件的预测情况。
非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的风险分层仍存在争议。
80例非缺血性扩张型心肌病且有自发性非持续性室性心动过速的患者接受了信号平均心电图检查(时域和频谱湍流分析)及程序刺激。所有患者平均随访22±26个月。
10例患者(13%)诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速,这些患者均接受了胺碘酮治疗。其余70例患者未接受抗心律失常治疗进行随访。80例患者中,15%在时域信号平均心电图上有异常发现,39%在频谱湍流分析中有异常发现。时域信号平均心电图对诱发性室性心动过速的预测准确性优于频谱湍流分析(88%对66%,p<0.01)。随访期间,有9例心律失常事件(5例猝死,4例自发性室性心动过速/心室颤动)和10例非猝死性心脏死亡。Cox回归分析显示,没有变量可预测心律失常事件或总心脏死亡。信号平均心电图或诱发性室性心动过速有无异常发现的患者,2年无心律失常事件的精算生存率相似。
在非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者中,1)时域信号平均心电图异常发现与诱发性室性心动过速之间存在强相关性,但这两种发现均不常见;以及2)信号平均心电图正常发现以及未能诱发出室性心动过速并不意味着预后良好。