Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Jul;118(1):39-48. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.118.1.39.
A comparison was made between 4 regimens of chemotherapy given for 6 or 8 months, with a 6-month period of follow-up thus far. One regimen, which had a 2-month initial intensive phase of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide followed by daily administration of thiacetazone and isoniazid, was very effective. Shortening the initial intensive 4-drug phase to 1 month produced a less successful regimen unless the continuation phase was twice-weekly administration of streptomycin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. A regimen in which pyrazinamide was omitted from the initial intensive 2-month phase was also less effective. All patients were inpatients for 6 months to ensure that every dose of drug was fully supervised during this period. Increasing the total duration of chemotherapy from 6 months to 8 months was associated with a significant decrease in the early relapse rate in all 4 regimens, although the above differences between the regimen remained. The applicability of the findings is discussed.
对4种化疗方案进行了比较,这些方案疗程为6个月或8个月,目前已有6个月的随访期。其中一种方案,初始强化期为2个月,使用链霉素、异烟肼、利福平及吡嗪酰胺,随后每日服用氨硫脲和异烟肼,效果非常显著。将初始强化期的4种药物治疗阶段缩短至1个月,若继续治疗阶段不是每周两次使用链霉素、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺,则方案效果欠佳。在初始强化期的2个月阶段中省去吡嗪酰胺的方案效果也较差。所有患者均住院6个月,以确保在此期间每剂药物都受到充分监督。将化疗总疗程从6个月延长至8个月,尽管各方案间仍存在上述差异,但所有4种方案的早期复发率均显著降低。本文还讨论了这些研究结果的适用性。