Castelo A, Mathiasi P A, Iunes R, Kritski A L, Dalcolmo M, Fiuza de Melo F, Drummond M
Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Nov;8(5):385-99. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508050-00003.
The treatment of tuberculosis (TB) is ranked as the most cost effective of all therapeutic programmes in terms of cost per year of life saved. Nevertheless, TB kills or debilitates more adults aged between 15 and 59 years than any other disease in the world; furthermore, about 2 to 4% of the burden of disease, 7% of all deaths and 26% of all preventable deaths are directly attributable to TB. About one-third of the world's population is infected with the TB bacillus. In the developing world, more women of childbearing age die from TB than from causes directly associated with pregnancy and childbirth. The death of adults in their prime, who are parents, community leaders and producers in most societies, causes a particularly onerous burden besides being a serious public health problem. In the poorest countries, where the magnitude of the TB problem is greatest, those TB control strategies that are economically feasible tend to be less effective. Therefore, in low and middle income countries, cost-effectiveness considerations aimed at prioritising resource allocation in the health sector in general, and in TB control programmes in particular, are of paramount importance. Operationally, the main components of a TB control programme are: (i) detection and treatment of TB; and (ii) prevention of TB through BCG vaccination and chemoprophylaxis. Priority should be given to ensuring that TB patients complete their prescribed course of chemotherapy. Adequate treatment is the most effective way of preventing the spread of TB and the emergence of drug resistance. This article reviews evidence of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of different approaches to TB care, particularly those that are applicable to low income countries, in both HIV-infected and noninfected patients. Financial implications and ways to implement directly observed therapy for TB in large urban areas are discussed, and the need to address some relevant operational issues is highlighted. The current role of chemoprophylaxis and BCG vaccination is also reviewed.
就每挽救一年生命的成本而言,结核病治疗被列为所有治疗方案中最具成本效益的。然而,结核病导致15至59岁成年人死亡或致残的人数超过世界上任何其他疾病;此外,约2%至4%的疾病负担、7%的所有死亡以及26%的所有可预防死亡直接归因于结核病。世界约三分之一的人口感染了结核杆菌。在发展中世界,育龄妇女死于结核病的人数多于死于与妊娠和分娩直接相关原因的人数。在大多数社会中,处于黄金时期的成年人作为父母、社区领袖和生产者,他们的死亡除了是一个严重的公共卫生问题外,还造成了特别沉重的负担。在结核病问题最严重的最贫穷国家,那些经济上可行的结核病控制策略往往效果较差。因此,在低收入和中等收入国家,考虑成本效益对于总体上在卫生部门、特别是在结核病控制项目中优先分配资源至关重要。在实际操作中,结核病控制项目的主要组成部分是:(一)结核病的检测和治疗;(二)通过卡介苗接种和化学预防预防结核病。应优先确保结核病患者完成规定的化疗疗程。充分治疗是预防结核病传播和耐药性出现的最有效方法。本文回顾了不同结核病护理方法的有效性和成本效益的证据,特别是那些适用于低收入国家的方法,涉及感染艾滋病毒和未感染艾滋病毒的患者。讨论了在大城市地区实施结核病直接观察治疗的财务影响和方法,并强调了解决一些相关操作问题的必要性。还回顾了化学预防和卡介苗接种的当前作用。