Suppr超能文献

严重颈动脉狭窄:诊断、手术时机及预后

Critical carotid artery stenosis: diagnosis, timing of surgery, and outcome.

作者信息

Berman S S, Bernhard V M, Erly W K, McIntyre K E, Erdoes L S, Hunter G C

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1994 Oct;20(4):499-508; discussion 508-10. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90274-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with critical carotid artery stenoses have been considered to be at high risk for carotid artery occlusion necessitating urgent or emergency endarterectomy once the stenosis is identified. Included in this group of patients are those with carotid string sign or atheromatous pseudoocclusion (APO). This review was conducted to determine the impact of the severity of stenosis including APO on the treatment and outcome of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

The records of 203 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in 197 patients were reviewed in detail. Patients were stratified into a critical stenosis group (80% to 99% diameter) and noncritical stenosis group based on noninvasive vascular laboratory and carotid arteriography results. Comparisons were performed of demographic data, atherosclerotic risk factors, carotid artery disease presentation, interval between arteriography and endarterectomy, operative details, and surgical results between the critical and noncritical groups and between patients in the critical group with and without APO.

RESULTS

Carotid endarterectomies were performed on 91 critical carotid artery stenoses and 112 noncritical stenoses. The groups did not differ significantly with regards to demographics, risk factors, carotid artery disease presentation, mean back pressure, and operative use of shunt or patch closure. For the critical group the interval between arteriography and endarterectomy was 8.63 +/- 2.38 days compared with 9.64 +/- 2.14 days for the noncritical group (mean +/- SEM, p = 0.75). No patient in either group progressed to occlusion in the interval between arteriography and endarterectomy. Perioperative strokes occurred in two patients (2%) in the critical group and four patients (3.6%) in the noncritical group (p = 0.09). Likewise, no significant difference was demonstrated in these variables when comparing patients with critical carotid artery stenosis and APO with those without APO.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a critical carotid artery stenosis including APO did not impact on the treatment or outcome of patients requiring endarterectomy nor did it imply the need for emergency intervention to prevent thrombosis. Surgical intervention can proceed after evaluation and optimization of comorbid conditions without undue concern for interval thrombosis.

摘要

目的

严重颈动脉狭窄患者一旦确诊狭窄,就被认为有发生颈动脉闭塞的高风险,需要进行紧急或急诊内膜切除术。这组患者包括有颈动脉串珠征或动脉粥样硬化性假性闭塞(APO)的患者。进行这项综述是为了确定包括APO在内的狭窄严重程度对接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的治疗及预后的影响。

方法

详细回顾了197例患者连续进行的203例颈动脉内膜切除术的记录。根据无创血管实验室检查和颈动脉造影结果,将患者分为严重狭窄组(直径80%至99%)和非严重狭窄组。比较了严重和非严重组之间以及严重组中有和没有APO的患者之间的人口统计学数据、动脉粥样硬化危险因素、颈动脉疾病表现、动脉造影与内膜切除术之间的间隔、手术细节和手术结果。

结果

对91例严重颈动脉狭窄和112例非严重狭窄进行了颈动脉内膜切除术。两组在人口统计学、危险因素、颈动脉疾病表现、平均背压以及分流或补片闭合的手术应用方面无显著差异。严重组动脉造影与内膜切除术之间的间隔为8.63±2.38天,非严重组为9.64±2.14天(平均值±标准误,p = 0.75)。两组中均无患者在动脉造影与内膜切除术之间的间隔期进展为闭塞。严重组有2例患者(2%)发生围手术期卒中,非严重组有4例患者(3.6%)发生围手术期卒中(p = 0.09)。同样,比较有严重颈动脉狭窄和APO的患者与没有APO的患者时,这些变量也没有显著差异。

结论

包括APO在内的严重颈动脉狭窄的存在对需要内膜切除术的患者的治疗或预后没有影响,也不意味着需要进行紧急干预以预防血栓形成。在评估和优化合并症后可进行手术干预,而无需过度担心间隔期血栓形成。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验