Dowd B, Moscovice I, Feldman R, Finch M, Wisner C, Hillson S
Institute for Health Services Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Med Care. 1994 Oct;32(10):1019-39. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199410000-00004.
This paper examines the relationship between characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries and their choice of health plan in the Twin Cities during 1988. This analysis provides the first comparison of beneficiaries in the basic fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare sector (without a supplementary policy) to beneficiaries in the FFS sector with a supplementary policy, enrollees in independent practice associations (IPAs), and network health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The site and time period are important because there were five large, mature HMOs with TEFRA-risk contracts operating at that time, enrolling 50% of Medicare beneficiaries in the market area. We find that the oldest, poorest and, to a lesser extent, the sickest Medicare beneficiaries were most likely to have basic FFS Medicare coverage without supplementary insurance. The youngest enrollees are found in network HMOs. The availability of group coverage and premium subsidies are positively associated with choice of FFS with a supplementary policy. Government policy concerning Medicare HMO premiums appears to contribute to the poorest beneficiaries facing the highest out-of-pocket costs.
本文研究了1988年明尼阿波利斯市医疗保险受益人的特征与其健康计划选择之间的关系。该分析首次比较了基本按服务付费(FFS)医疗保险部门(无补充政策)的受益人与有补充政策的FFS部门的受益人、独立执业协会(IPA)的参保人以及网络健康维护组织(HMO)的参保人。研究地点和时间段很重要,因为当时有五家大型、成熟的HMO签订了TEFRA风险合同,在市场区域内参保了50%的医疗保险受益人。我们发现,年龄最大、最贫困以及在一定程度上病情最严重的医疗保险受益人最有可能只拥有基本的FFS医疗保险,而没有补充保险。最年轻的参保人则出现在网络HMO中。团体保险和保费补贴的可获得性与选择有补充政策的FFS呈正相关。政府有关医疗保险HMO保费的政策似乎导致最贫困的受益人面临最高的自付费用。