Duca P G, Pelfini G, Ferguglia G, Settimi L, Peverelli C, Sevosi I, Terzaghi G
Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Università degli Studi, Milano.
Med Lav. 1994 May-Jun;85(3):231-8.
A total of 942 workers of 13 dyeing and printing factories in the area of Como (N. Italy) were examined in order to detect skin complaints on the hands and forearms. Of these, 868 were eligible for and consented to participate in a controlled and randomized experiment aimed at assessing the efficacy of using barrier creams in practical circumstances. 657 workers underwent all three control examinations arranged over about one year. In the randomized group for treatment with barrier creams the cumulative incidence of objective skin lesions was significantly lower than in the group in which no particular recommendation of use was made (44.5% versus 54.4% positive for objective examination in at least one of the three control examinations after recruitment: 95% confidence limits of the difference between 2%-17% percentages; 39.9% versus 47.0% in subjects who were negative at the recruitment examination, 59.0% versus 76.8% in subjects who were positive at the recruitment examination). The use of a hydrocarbon cream was significantly more effective than using a silicone cream (95% confidence limits of the differences of cumulative incidences: -10.9% +20.7% comparing silicone creams with non-treatment; 2.8%-20.2% comparing hydrocarbon creams with non-treatment).
为了检测手部和前臂的皮肤问题,对意大利北部科莫地区13家印染厂的942名工人进行了检查。其中,868人符合条件并同意参与一项对照随机实验,旨在评估在实际工作环境中使用防护霜的效果。657名工人接受了为期约一年的全部三次对照检查。在使用防护霜治疗的随机分组中,目标性皮肤损伤的累积发病率显著低于未给出特定使用建议的组(招募后三次对照检查中至少有一次目标性检查呈阳性的比例分别为44.5%和54.4%:差异的95%置信区间为2%-17%;招募检查呈阴性的受试者中分别为39.9%和47.0%,招募检查呈阳性的受试者中分别为59.0%和76.8%)。使用烃类乳膏比使用硅酮乳膏的效果显著更好(累积发病率差异的95%置信区间:硅酮乳膏与未治疗相比为-10.9% +20.7%;烃类乳膏与未治疗相比为2.8%-20.2%)。