Khosravi-Far R, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Solski P A, Eva A, Burridge K, Der C J
Department of Cellular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599.
Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;14(10):6848-57. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.6848-6857.1994.
Vav and Dbl are members of a novel class of oncogene proteins that share significant sequence identity in a approximately 250-amino-acid domain, designated the Dbl homology domain. Although Dbl functions as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and activator of Rho family proteins, recent evidence has demonstrated that Vav functions as a GEF for Ras proteins. Thus, transformation by Vav and Dbl may be a consequence of constitutive activation of Ras and Rho proteins, respectively. To address this possibility, we have compared the transforming activities of Vav and Dbl with that of the Ras GEF, GRF/CDC25. As expected, GRF-transformed cells exhibited the same reduction in actin stress fibers and focal adhesions as Ras-transformed cells. In contrast, Vav- and Dbl-transformed cells showed the same well-developed stress fibers and focal adhesions observed in normal or RhoA(63L)-transformed NIH 3T3 cells. Furthermore, neither Vav- or Dbl-transformed cells exhibited the elevated levels of Ras-GTP (60%) observed with GRF-transformed cells. Finally, GRF, but not Vav or Dbl, induced transcriptional activation from Ras-responsive DNA elements (ets/AP-1, fos promoter, and kappa B). However, like Ras- and GRF-transformed cells, both Vav- and Dbl-transformed cells exhibited constitutively activated mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (primarily p42MAPK/ERK2). Since kinase-deficient forms of p42MAPK/ERK2 and p44MAPK/ERK1 inhibited Dbl transformation, MAPK activation may be an important component of its transforming activity. Taken together, our observations indicate that Vav and Dbl transformation is not a consequence of Ras activation and instead may involve the constitutive activation of MAPKs.
Vav和Dbl是一类新型癌基因蛋白的成员,它们在一个约250个氨基酸的结构域中具有显著的序列同一性,该结构域被称为Dbl同源结构域。虽然Dbl作为鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子(GEF)发挥作用,是Rho家族蛋白的激活剂,但最近的证据表明Vav作为Ras蛋白的GEF发挥作用。因此,Vav和Dbl介导的转化可能分别是Ras和Rho蛋白组成性激活的结果。为了探究这种可能性,我们将Vav和Dbl的转化活性与Ras GEF即GRF/CDC25的转化活性进行了比较。正如预期的那样,GRF转化的细胞与Ras转化的细胞一样,肌动蛋白应力纤维和粘着斑减少。相反,Vav和Dbl转化的细胞表现出与正常或RhoA(63L)转化的NIH 3T3细胞中观察到的相同发达的应力纤维和粘着斑。此外,Vav或Dbl转化的细胞均未表现出GRF转化的细胞中观察到的Ras-GTP水平升高(60%)。最后,GRF而非Vav或Dbl诱导了来自Ras反应性DNA元件(ets/AP-1、fos启动子和κB)的转录激活。然而,与Ras和GRF转化的细胞一样,Vav和Dbl转化的细胞均表现出组成性激活的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)(主要是p42MAPK/ERK2)。由于p42MAPK/ERK2和p44MAPK/ERK1的激酶缺陷形式抑制了Dbl转化,MAPK激活可能是其转化活性的重要组成部分。综上所述,我们的观察结果表明,Vav和Dbl介导的转化不是Ras激活的结果,相反可能涉及MAPK的组成性激活。