van Dijk J G, van der Kamp W, van Hilten B J, van Someren P
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Nov;17(11):1286-92. doi: 10.1002/mus.880171107.
The distinctions between blocking, abnormal temporal dispersion, and normal conduction require delineation of the normal change in amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) over a length of nerve. Effects of the recording site on CMAP amplitude and on its variation were studied in median and ulnar nerves of 13 healthy subjects. CMAPs were recorded from three sites: halfway along the muscles and 1 cm distal and proximal. Elbow-wrist amplitude percentages (CMAP%) were calculated. CMAP amplitudes varied considerably between sites and subjects. Amplitudes were maximal at the middle site in only 16 of 26 nerves. The site of maximal amplitude could not be identified on the basis of thumb anatomy. CMAP% was not related to CMAP amplitude, and differed by up to 32% between adjacent sites. CMAP formation involves spatial factors (electrode site, limb position, and limb anatomy), temporal factors (dispersion), and their interaction, explaining why CMAP% can exceed 100%. The site of the recording electrode affects CMAP amplitude and CMAP% to clinically relevant degrees. Standardization of the recording site may improve reliability of CMAP% studies.
阻滞、异常时间离散和正常传导之间的区别需要明确复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)在一段神经长度上的正常幅度变化。在13名健康受试者的正中神经和尺神经中研究了记录部位对CMAP幅度及其变化的影响。从三个部位记录CMAP:肌肉中点、肌肉远端1厘米处和近端1厘米处。计算肘-腕幅度百分比(CMAP%)。CMAP幅度在不同部位和受试者之间差异很大。在26条神经中,只有16条神经在中点部位的幅度最大。无法根据拇指解剖结构确定最大幅度的部位。CMAP%与CMAP幅度无关,相邻部位之间相差高达32%。CMAP的形成涉及空间因素(电极部位、肢体位置和肢体解剖结构)、时间因素(离散)及其相互作用,这解释了为什么CMAP%可以超过100%。记录电极的部位对CMAP幅度和CMAP%有临床相关程度的影响。记录部位的标准化可能会提高CMAP%研究的可靠性。