Wineman N M, Durand E J, McCulloch B J
College of Nursing, University of Akron, OH.
Nurs Res. 1994 Sep-Oct;43(5):268-73.
The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire in a clinical population. The questionnaire, designed to measure coping behaviors in a community-residing well population, contained eight empirically constructed factors. Confirmatory factor analysis with LISREL was used to validate this original eight-factor model with 655 community-residing adults with multiple sclerosis or a spinal cord injury. The hypothesized model was not a good fit to the data. Subsequent analyses, using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis procedures, identified three different coping factors: Cognitive Reframing, Emotional Respite, and Direct Assistance. These factors appeared to have greater applicability to people with chronic conditions. The kinds of coping behaviors used to manage stressful situations by individuals who are well may be quite different from those used by community-residing populations with long-term chronic conditions.
本研究的目的是检验应对方式问卷在临床人群中的结构效度。该问卷旨在测量社区健康人群的应对行为,包含八个通过实证构建的因子。使用LISREL进行验证性因子分析,以验证这个最初的八因子模型,样本为655名患有多发性硬化症或脊髓损伤的社区成年居民。假设模型与数据拟合不佳。随后采用探索性和验证性因子分析程序进行分析,确定了三种不同的应对因子:认知重构、情绪缓解和直接援助。这些因子似乎对慢性病患者具有更大的适用性。健康个体用于应对压力情况的应对行为类型可能与患有长期慢性病的社区居民所采用的行为类型有很大不同。