Dahhaoui M, Caston J, Stelz T
Université de Rouen, Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie sensorielle, Faculté des Sciences, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.
Physiol Behav. 1994 Aug;56(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90193-7.
Adult cerebellectomized and noncerebellectomized DA/HAN strain (pigmented) female rats were submitted to a one-trial passive avoidance conditioning procedure consisting in associating darkness with a nociceptive stimulus. Seven days later, they were tested again to assess the retention stage. The results demonstrate that in noncerebellectomized rats, picrotoxin, whatever the dose, administered prior to the retention test, does not significantly impair retrieval. On the contrary, when administered just prior to the initial conditioning, impairments of the initial single nociceptive experience were evident (the greater the picrotoxin dose, the greater the impairments). In animals that were cerebellectomized 1 week before the experiment, picrotoxin administered at a low dose before the initial experience elicited memory impairments that were similar to those induced in noncerebellectomized rats but that were greater than those elicited in cerebellectomized, nontreated animals. However, in cerebellectomized rats, picrotoxin administered at a low dose elicited memory impairments that were weaker than in noncerebellectomized animals injected with a high dose of the drug. Considering that a low dose of picrotoxin administered to cerebellectomized animals had effects that were similar to those of a high dose injected to noncerebellectomized rats, and given that it has previously been demonstrated that a cerebellectomy performed after a single nociceptive experience impairs its memory, it is tempting to suggest that the two different doses of the drug administered to cerebellectomized and noncerebellectomized rats have similar effects on memory. If such an interpretation is valid, the information would have to leave the cerebellar cortex to be stored for long.
将成年小脑切除和未切除小脑的DA/HAN品系(有色)雌性大鼠进行单次被动回避条件反射程序,该程序包括将黑暗与伤害性刺激联系起来。七天后,再次对它们进行测试以评估记忆保持阶段。结果表明,在未切除小脑的大鼠中,在记忆保持测试前给予印防己毒素,无论剂量如何,都不会显著损害记忆提取。相反,在初次条件反射前给予印防己毒素时,初次单次伤害性体验的损害很明显(印防己毒素剂量越大,损害越大)。在实验前1周进行小脑切除的动物中,在初次体验前给予低剂量的印防己毒素会引发与未切除小脑的大鼠中诱导的记忆损害相似,但比未治疗的小脑切除动物中引发的记忆损害更大。然而,在小脑切除的大鼠中,低剂量给予印防己毒素引发的记忆损害比注射高剂量药物的未切除小脑的动物要弱。考虑到给小脑切除的动物低剂量给予印防己毒素产生的效果与给未切除小脑的大鼠注射高剂量产生的效果相似,并且鉴于先前已证明在单次伤害性体验后进行小脑切除会损害其记忆,很容易推测给小脑切除和未切除小脑的大鼠施用的两种不同剂量的药物对记忆有相似的影响。如果这种解释是有效的,那么信息将必须离开小脑皮质才能长期存储。