Evans B J, Drasdo N, Richards I L
Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, England.
Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(14):1913-26. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90315-8.
The role of visual factors in dyslexia has been a long-standing source of controversy. Recent research has suggested that there may be a deficit of the transient visual subsystem in dyslexia. The evidence for this hypothesis comes principally from investigations of spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity and visual persistence. This evidence is reviewed and it is noted that previous work has never applied two of these purported "tests of transient function" to the same subject group. The hypothesised transient system deficit in dyslexia was investigated in a study comparing 43 control with 39 dyslexic children who were matched for age, sex, and intelligence. Comprehensive psychometric and optometric data were obtained, including visual acuities and refractive errors. The spatial contrast sensitivity function was determined in such a way as to investigate further the findings of Lovegrove, Martin, Bowling, Blackwood, Badcock and Paxton [(1982) Neuropsychology, 20, 309-315] and Martin and Lovegrove [(1984) Neuropsychologia, 22, 73-77]. It might be expected, from the work of Merigan and Maunsell [(1990) Neuroscience, 5, 347-352], that a better test of magno-cellular function would be to investigate the modulation threshold for a virtually uniform field that was flickering sinusoidally at 10 Hz. This temporal contrast sensitivity was studied in a similar way to Brannan and Williams [(1988) Clinical Vision Sciences, 3, 137-142]. A non-verbal simulated reading visual search task was used to investigate the effect of any visual deficits on a test that was, in its low-level visual requirements, similar to reading. The following factors were found to be significantly associated with dyslexia: reduced visual acuity, impaired flicker detection at 10 Hz, reduced low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity, and slightly slower performance at a simulated reading visual search task. The two alleged "tests of transient function" were only weakly correlated with one another (r = 0.183), suggesting that these variables do not measure the same function. Much of the dyslexic group's slightly slower performance at the simulated reading task could be accounted for by the psychometric variable of visual sequential memory. Like reading, the simulated reading task requires the accurate perception of sequential characters. Hence, it seems unlikely that the low-level visual deficits in the dyslexic group were major causes of their poor reading performance. Alternative explanations for the results are discussed.
视觉因素在诵读困难中所起的作用长期以来一直是争议的焦点。最近的研究表明,诵读困难可能存在瞬态视觉子系统缺陷。这一假设的证据主要来自对空间和时间对比敏感度以及视觉持久性的研究。本文对这些证据进行了综述,并指出以往的研究从未将这两项所谓的“瞬态功能测试”应用于同一组受试者。在一项研究中,对43名对照儿童和39名诵读困难儿童进行了比较,这些儿童在年龄、性别和智力方面相互匹配,以此来研究诵读困难中假设的瞬态系统缺陷。获取了全面的心理测量和验光数据,包括视力和屈光不正情况。确定空间对比敏感度函数的方式是为了进一步研究洛夫格罗夫、马丁、鲍林、布莱克伍德、巴德科克和帕克斯顿[(1982年)《神经心理学》,20卷,309 - 315页]以及马丁和洛夫格罗夫[(1984年)《神经心理学》,22卷,73 - 77页]的研究结果。根据梅里根和莫塞尔[(1990年)《神经科学》,5卷,347 - 352页]的研究,或许可以预期,对大细胞功能更好的测试是研究在10赫兹正弦波闪烁的几乎均匀场的调制阈值。以与布兰南和威廉姆斯[(1988年)《临床视觉科学》,3卷,137 - 142页]类似的方式研究了这种时间对比敏感度。使用一项非语言模拟阅读视觉搜索任务来研究任何视觉缺陷对一项测试的影响,该测试在低水平视觉要求方面与阅读相似。发现以下因素与诵读困难显著相关:视力下降、10赫兹时闪烁检测受损、低空间频率对比敏感度降低以及在模拟阅读视觉搜索任务中的表现略慢。这两项所谓的“瞬态功能测试”彼此之间仅存在微弱的相关性(r = 0.183),这表明这些变量测量的不是同一功能。诵读困难组在模拟阅读任务中表现略慢的情况,很大程度上可以由视觉序列记忆的心理测量变量来解释。与阅读一样,模拟阅读任务需要准确感知连续的字符。因此,诵读困难组的低水平视觉缺陷似乎不太可能是其阅读成绩差的主要原因。文中还讨论了对这些结果的其他解释。