Ardron M J, Westengard J C, Dutcher T F
Department of Pathology, Loma Linda University Medical Center.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Nov;102(5):646-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/102.5.646.
The authors have assessed the clinical value of an "accurate" band count as a correlate to infection in 33 patients with a culture proven bacterial infection and a normal total leukocyte count. Thirty hematologically normal outpatients, presumably with no infections, were selected for the control group. Manual 500 cell differentials were performed on each subject in both groups. The absolute and percent band count, the absolute and percent total neutrophil count, and the presence of neutrophils more immature than bands were analyzed for their ability to identify the patients with an infection. The presence of neutrophils more immature than bands and the absolute neutrophil count are the two values that best separated the infected patients from the outpatients, even though the selected patients had a normal total leukocyte count. The band count had minimal value for identifying infected patients. Other studies were reviewed regarding the utility of band counts. The authors conclude that manual band counts are unnecessary because when accompanied by a clinical assessment of the patient, automated instruments accurately provide the appropriate hematologic data that may aid in the diagnosis of infection.
作者评估了“准确”的杆状核细胞计数作为33例经培养证实有细菌感染且总白细胞计数正常患者感染相关指标的临床价值。选择30名血液学正常的门诊患者作为对照组,推测他们没有感染。对两组的每个受试者进行了500个细胞的手工分类计数。分析了杆状核细胞的绝对计数和百分比、总中性粒细胞的绝对计数和百分比,以及比杆状核细胞更不成熟的中性粒细胞的存在情况,以确定其识别感染患者的能力。即使所选患者的总白细胞计数正常,比杆状核细胞更不成熟的中性粒细胞的存在和中性粒细胞绝对计数是将感染患者与门诊患者最佳区分开的两个指标。杆状核细胞计数在识别感染患者方面价值极小。作者还回顾了其他关于杆状核细胞计数效用的研究。作者得出结论,手工杆状核细胞计数没有必要,因为在对患者进行临床评估时,自动化仪器能准确提供有助于感染诊断的适当血液学数据。