• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生自我转诊困境:以执行反垄断法作为解决方案。

The physician self-referral dilemma: enforcing antitrust law as a solution.

作者信息

Mathews J E

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1993;19(4):523-46.

PMID:7942867
Abstract

As health care reform pervades the United States, lawmakers have subjected physician self-referrals to heightened scrutiny. Recent evidence indicates that sending patients to facilities in which a physician has an ownership interest often causes overutilization, overpricing, and lower quality of care. This Note analyzes how physician self-referral arrangements can have negative effects on competition. To combat the adverse effects, the Note examines how enforcing antitrust laws can ameliorate the self-referral dilemma and aid in restoring competition to the health care market. This solution will maintain the doctor's right to invest while protecting the patient's vulnerability.

摘要

随着医疗保健改革在美国全面推行,立法者对医生自我转诊进行了更严格的审查。最近的证据表明,将患者转诊至医生拥有所有权权益的机构往往会导致过度使用、定价过高以及医疗质量下降。本笔记分析了医生自我转诊安排如何会对竞争产生负面影响。为应对这些不利影响,本笔记探讨了实施反垄断法如何能够缓解自我转诊困境,并有助于恢复医疗保健市场的竞争。这一解决方案将在保护患者脆弱性的同时,维护医生的投资权。

相似文献

1
The physician self-referral dilemma: enforcing antitrust law as a solution.医生自我转诊困境:以执行反垄断法作为解决方案。
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(4):523-46.
2
Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?医生自荐:《斯塔克 II》第三阶段是最后一程吗?
Pain Physician. 2007 Nov;10(6):725-41.
3
Legal obstacles to medical communities' full participation in managed care.医疗界全面参与管理式医疗的法律障碍。
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):9-16.
4
The response to health care reform by the pharmaceutical industry.制药行业对医疗保健改革的回应。
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(1):1-22.
5
Physician self referral arrangements: legitimate business or unethical "entrepreneurialism".医生自我推荐安排:合法业务还是不道德的“利己主义”
Am J Law Med. 1989;15(1):61-109.
6
Antitrust, health care quality, and the courts.反垄断、医疗保健质量与法院。
Columbia Law Rev. 2002 Apr;102(3):545-649.
7
The legal framework for effective competition.有效竞争的法律框架。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:235-65.
8
The negative impact of stark law exemptions on graduate medical education and health care costs: the example of radiation oncology.明显偏法令豁免对研究生医学教育和医疗成本的负面影响:以放射肿瘤学为例。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.061.
9
Imaging rules changing focus. The CMS' revisions to imaging reimbursements, self-referrals could give hospitals a leg up on their physician competitors in '07.影像规则改变重点。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对影像报销的修订、自我转诊可能会让医院在2007年比其医生竞争对手更具优势。
Mod Healthc. 2006 Nov 27;36(47):26-8.
10
Surveying the competition. FTC, DOJ report: competing benefits consumers.审视竞争。联邦贸易委员会、美国司法部报告:竞争造福消费者。
Mod Healthc. 2004 Jul 26;34(30):12.