Grunder A A, Sabour M P, Gavora J S
Centre for Food and Animal Research, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Anim Genet. 1994 Jun;25 Suppl 1:81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00407.x.
The purpose of this study was to determine if DNA fingerprints (DFPs) could be used to estimate relatedness and inbreeding of strains of geese and to compare three methods of calculating relatedness indices. Strains included a control and selected strain from each of the Chinese and Synthetic (Chinese, Hungarian and Pilgrim) breeds. DFP patterns for each strain were based on individual DNA samples from six females, or on pooled DNA from 15 females different from those used for individual samples. Three relatedness indices were used, namely, genetic distance, modified Rogers distance and band sharing. All relatedness indices showed a closer relationship of strains within than between breeds. Correlation coefficients among relatedness indices were higher based on pooled DNA (r > or = magnitude of 0.97) than those based on individual DNA (r > or = magnitude of 0.741). Inbreeding estimates were higher for selected compared with control strains. It appears that the use of DFPs to estimate relatedness, regardless of index used, and inbreeding can be valuable for studying geese where there is a limited breeding history.
本研究的目的是确定DNA指纹图谱(DFP)是否可用于估计鹅品系的亲缘关系和近亲繁殖情况,并比较三种计算亲缘关系指数的方法。品系包括来自中国品种和合成品种(中国、匈牙利和白额雁)的一个对照品系和一个选择品系。每个品系的DFP图谱基于6只雌性个体的DNA样本,或基于来自15只与用于个体样本的雌性不同的雌性个体的混合DNA。使用了三种亲缘关系指数,即遗传距离、改良罗杰斯距离和条带共享。所有亲缘关系指数均表明,品系内的亲缘关系比品种间的更密切。基于混合DNA的亲缘关系指数之间的相关系数(r≥0.97)高于基于个体DNA的相关系数(r≥0.741)。与对照品系相比,选择品系的近亲繁殖估计值更高。看来,无论使用何种指数,利用DFP来估计亲缘关系和近亲繁殖情况对于研究繁殖历史有限的鹅来说可能是有价值的。