Paulhan I, Nuissier J, Quintard B, Cousson F, Bourgeois M
Université de Bordeaux II, Laboratoire de Psychologie, Talence, France.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1994 Jun;152(5):292-9.
Coping is currently defined as "the various cognitive or behavioral efforts intended to master or tolerate the internal or external demands which threaten or go beyond the resources of a subject "(Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). The general objective of this work was to present the french version of a coping scale (Vitaliano et al., 1985) for the assessment of the different types of coping strategies which one can use when confronting an adversive event. Our population is composed of 501 adults (329 female and 172 males) of the age of 20 to 35 years. A Principal Component Analysis gave us a general factor of coping (12% V.T.) which gathers emotional focused strategies and problem focused strategies. The factorial analysis with varimax rotation confirmed the existence of 5 specific types of coping strategies. These are "solving problem" factor (9.4% V.T.), "avoidance with wishful thinking" factor (7.5% V.T.), "seeks social support" factor (6.5% V.T.), "positive reevaluation" factor (5.9% V.T.) and "self-blamed" (5.7% V.T.). These results allowed us to construct a valid questionnaire of 29 items measuring 5 types of coping strategies.
应对目前被定义为“旨在掌控或容忍那些威胁或超出个体资源的内部或外部需求的各种认知或行为努力”（拉扎勒斯和福克曼，1984年）。这项工作的总体目标是呈现一份应对量表的法语版本（维塔利诺等人，1985年），用于评估在面对逆境事件时人们可以采用的不同类型的应对策略。我们的研究对象由501名年龄在20至35岁之间的成年人组成（329名女性和172名男性）。主成分分析得出了一个应对的一般因素（方差贡献率为12%），它涵盖了情绪聚焦策略和问题聚焦策略。采用方差最大化旋转的因子分析证实了存在5种特定类型的应对策略。它们分别是“解决问题”因子（方差贡献率为9.4%）、“一厢情愿式回避”因子（方差贡献率为7.5%）、“寻求社会支持”因子（方差贡献率为6.5%）、“积极重新评价”因子（方差贡献率为5.9%）和“自我责备”因子（方差贡献率为5.7%）。这些结果使我们能够构建一份由29个项目组成的有效问卷，用于测量5种应对策略类型。
