Ostchega Y, Long L R, Goh G H, Hirsch R, Ma L D, Scott W W, Johnson W, Thoma G R
Division of Health Examination Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3):116-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03168734.
In the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, radiographs of the hands and knees were taken of participants 60 years and older as part of the study of arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of the study was to decide the digitizing resolution to be used for these radiographs. A set of wrist and hand radiographs (N = 49) was graded by two radiologists for degree of bone erosions and served as a "gold standard." The radiographs were then digitized at three resolution levels; low-resolution 150 microns (2001 x 1634 x 12 bit matrix); intermediate-resolution 100 microns (3000 x 2400 x 12 bit matrix); and high-resolution 50 microns (4900 x 3000 x 12 bit matrix). A comparison of the digital images versus the gold standard reading was made at the three resolutions by two radiologists. Kappa statistics suggested fair (K > .4) to excellent (K > .75) agreement between the gold standard and the images at all levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested high agreement between readers (ICC > .5), with minimal individual reader effect. Variance component estimates showed that the major contribution (78-83%) to scoring came from variability in the images themselves, not from the readers. The 100 microns resolution was selected over the 150 and 50 microns on the basis of practical considerations such as storage requirements, display time, and easier manipulation of the digital images by the readers.
在美国疾病控制与预防中心国家卫生统计中心开展的第三次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III)中,作为关节炎和肌肉骨骼疾病研究的一部分,对60岁及以上的参与者拍摄了手部和膝盖的X光片。该研究的目的是确定用于这些X光片的数字化分辨率。一组手腕和手部X光片(N = 49)由两名放射科医生对骨侵蚀程度进行分级,并作为“金标准”。然后将这些X光片在三个分辨率水平上进行数字化处理;低分辨率为150微米(2001×1634×12位矩阵);中等分辨率为100微米(3000×2400×12位矩阵);高分辨率为50微米(4900×3000×12位矩阵)。两名放射科医生在这三种分辨率下对数字图像与金标准读数进行了比较。Kappa统计表明,在所有水平上,金标准与图像之间的一致性为一般(K > 0.4)到优秀(K > 0.75)。组内相关系数表明读者之间的一致性较高(ICC > 0.5),个体读者效应最小。方差成分估计表明,评分的主要贡献(78 - 83%)来自图像本身的变异性,而非读者。基于存储需求、显示时间以及读者对数字图像更易于操作等实际考虑因素,选择了100微米分辨率而非150微米和50微米分辨率。