Suppr超能文献

联合治疗在类风湿性关节炎中的疗效与毒性:一项荟萃分析。

The efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Felson D T, Anderson J J, Meenan R F

机构信息

Boston University Arthritis Center, Massachusetts 02118.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1487-91. doi: 10.1002/art.1780371012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy, compared with single second-line drug therapy, in rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This study was a meta-analysis of published trials that evaluated combinations of full-dose second-line drugs and compared them with single second-line drugs at full dose. Using a random effects model, we summarized the difference between improvement with combination therapy and improvement with single-drug therapy.

RESULTS

Five trials that met inclusion criteria, which contained 749 entering patients and 516 completing patients, were identified. The mean +/- SEM difference in improvement in tender joint count between combination and single-drug therapy at end of trial (24-52 weeks) was 2.4 +/- 0.7 joints (out of 60) (P < 0.001). At end of trial the difference between therapies in swollen joint counts was 1.0 +/- 1.2 joints (P = 0.42). The difference in grip strength improvement was 3.7 +/- 4.3 mm Hg (P = 0.40), and for erythrocyte sedimentation rate it was 3.4 +/- 3.1 mm/hour (P = 0.27). In general, the differences in efficacy between combination and single-drug therapy were clinically marginal. Nine percent more combination therapy-treated patients experienced side effect-related discontinuation of therapy than patients receiving single-drug therapy (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy, as it has been used in recent clinical trials, does not offer a substantial improvement in efficacy, but does have higher toxicity than single drug therapy. These combination therapy regimens are not recommended for widespread use. Other more aggressive regimens with additional drugs or higher drug doses than have been studied might be more efficacious, but with an even higher rate of toxicity.

摘要

目的

评估联合治疗与单药二线治疗相比在类风湿关节炎中的疗效和毒性。

方法

本研究是对已发表试验的荟萃分析,这些试验评估了全剂量二线药物联合治疗,并将其与全剂量单药二线治疗进行比较。我们使用随机效应模型总结了联合治疗与单药治疗在改善情况上的差异。

结果

确定了5项符合纳入标准的试验,共纳入749例患者,其中516例完成试验。试验结束时(24 - 52周),联合治疗与单药治疗在压痛关节数改善方面的平均差异(±标准误)为2.4±0.7个关节(共60个关节)(P<0.001)。试验结束时,两种治疗方法在肿胀关节数方面的差异为1.0±1.2个关节(P = 0.42)。握力改善方面的差异为3.7±4.3mmHg(P = 0.40),红细胞沉降率方面的差异为3.4±3.1mm/小时(P = 0.27)。总体而言,联合治疗与单药治疗在疗效上的差异在临床上不显著。接受联合治疗的患者因副作用停药的比例比接受单药治疗的患者高9%(P = 0.008)。

结论

如近期临床试验中所使用的联合治疗,在疗效上没有显著改善,但毒性高于单药治疗。不建议广泛使用这些联合治疗方案。其他更积极的方案,如使用比已研究的药物更多或剂量更高的药物,可能更有效,但毒性率甚至更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验