Bodagh I Y, Robertson D R
St Martin's Hospital, Bath and West Community (NHS) Trust, Avon, England.
Drug Saf. 1994 Aug;11(2):94-103. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199411020-00004.
The introduction of levodopa therapy in the 1960s and subsequent advances in neuropharmacology have revolutionised the management of Parkinson's disease but at a cost. Adverse effects are common, and an erratic pattern of response may develop with long term therapy due to a poorly understood interaction between drug treatment and disease progression. Not all features of the disease respond to drugs, and certain aspects such as psychiatric symptoms and postural imbalance may indeed be exacerbated. Patients vary considerably in their tolerance of anti-Parkinsonian drugs. Individual assessment of each patient's medical, psychiatric and functional problems is required, with ongoing review and dose titration as the disease progresses. In recent years there has been increasing interest in whether it is possible to influence the progression of Parkinson's disease. As a result more complicated drug regimens are being advocated for use in newly diagnosed patients. Arguments for and against this approach, as opposed to traditional symptomatic treatment, are presented.
20世纪60年代左旋多巴疗法的引入以及随后神经药理学的进展彻底改变了帕金森病的治疗方式,但这是有代价的。不良反应很常见,由于药物治疗与疾病进展之间的相互作用尚不清楚,长期治疗可能会出现不稳定的反应模式。并非疾病的所有特征都对药物有反应,某些方面如精神症状和姿势失衡可能确实会加重。患者对抗帕金森病药物的耐受性差异很大。需要对每位患者的医学、精神和功能问题进行个体评估,并随着疾病进展进行持续复查和剂量滴定。近年来,人们越来越关注是否有可能影响帕金森病的进展。因此,有人主张对新诊断的患者使用更复杂的药物方案。本文将阐述支持和反对这种方法(与传统对症治疗相对)的观点。