Reiss S
Ohio State University.
Am J Ment Retard. 1994 Jul;99(1):1-7.
Responses were made to MacMillan, Gresham, and Siperstein's (1993) criticisms of the new AAMR definition. The new AAMR definition does not raise the IQ limit and is not intended to increase the number of people considered to have mental retardation. There is no intent to change who is and who is not considered to have mental retardation. Instead, the intent is to change how people think about mental retardation: The old deficiency model is replaced with a new support model. MacMillan et al.'s criticisms are based on unfortunate misstatements of both the 1983 and the 1992 AAMR definitions of mental retardation and on misunderstandings of psychometric science. On the one hand, they argued that intelligence tests are culturally biased. On the other hand, they criticized the AAMR for not making greater use of inflexible IQ cutoffs in defining mental retardation. They misunderstood that cultural bias is an argument for, not against, flexibility in the interpretation of intelligence tests.
针对麦克米伦、格雷沙姆和西珀斯坦(1993年)对美国智力缺陷协会(AAMR)新定义的批评作出了回应。美国智力缺陷协会的新定义并未提高智商界限,也无意增加被视为智力迟钝的人数。无意改变哪些人被视为或不被视为智力迟钝。相反,目的是改变人们对智力迟钝的看法:旧的缺陷模型被新的支持模型所取代。麦克米伦等人的批评基于对1983年和1992年美国智力缺陷协会智力迟钝定义的不幸错误陈述以及对心理测量学的误解。一方面,他们认为智力测试存在文化偏见。另一方面,他们批评美国智力缺陷协会在定义智力迟钝时没有更多地使用僵化的智商临界值。他们误解了文化偏见是支持而非反对灵活解释智力测试的论据。