Deriu G P, Franceschi L, Milite D, Calabro A, Saia A, Grego F, Cognolato D, Frigatti P, Diana M
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Padova, Italy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1994 Jul;8(4):337-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02132994.
The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the perioperative hazards and late results of internal carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with and without contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. From March 1980 to April 1990, 375 consecutive patients underwent 439 CEAs at the First Department of Vascular Surgery of Padova Medical School. Patients were divided into two groups; group 1 (61 patients) had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and group 2 (314 patients) did not (378 CEAs, 64 bilateral). Indications for CEA were similar in both groups. The only significant difference in patient characteristics was a higher rate of previous stroke in group 1 (11% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). General anesthesia, continuous EEG monitoring, selective intraluminal shunt, and arteriotomy closure with a polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE) were used routinely in both groups. An intraluminal shunt was inserted more frequently in group 1 than in group 2 (69% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Major perioperative stroke occurred in one patient in each group (1.7% vs. 0.31%, respectively; NS). Early fatal stroke rates were 0% and 0.95% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (NS). All patients had neurologic examinations and duplex scans every 6 months (range 6 to 118 months; mean 42 months). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were virtually identical in the two groups; the majority of deaths were caused by myocardial infarction and cancer. There were no stroke-related deaths in group 1 as compared with 8.2% in group 2 (NS). New neurologic symptoms appeared in 4.7% of patients in group 1 and 6% in group 2 (NS) whereas the late stroke rates were 0% and 3.1%, respectively (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在分析和比较有或无对侧颈内动脉闭塞的患者行颈内动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的围手术期风险和远期结果。1980年3月至1990年4月,帕多瓦医学院第一血管外科连续375例患者接受了439次CEA手术。患者分为两组;第1组(61例患者)有对侧颈内动脉闭塞,第2组(314例患者)无对侧颈内动脉闭塞(378次CEA手术,64例双侧手术)。两组CEA的手术指征相似。患者特征方面唯一显著的差异是第1组既往中风发生率较高(11%对3%,p<0.001)。两组均常规采用全身麻醉、连续脑电图监测、选择性腔内分流以及用聚四氟乙烯补片(PTFE)闭合动脉切开术。第1组比第2组更频繁地插入腔内分流管(69%对17%,p<0.001)。两组各有1例患者发生主要围手术期中风(分别为1.7%对0.31%;无统计学差异)。第1组和第2组的早期致命性中风发生率分别为0%和0.95%(无统计学差异)。所有患者每6个月进行一次神经学检查和双功扫描(范围6至118个月;平均42个月)。两组的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线几乎相同;大多数死亡由心肌梗死和癌症引起。第1组无中风相关死亡,而第2组为8.2%(无统计学差异)。第1组4.7%的患者出现新的神经症状,第2组为6%(无统计学差异),而晚期中风发生率分别为0%和3.1%(无统计学差异)。(摘要截取自250字)