Choo K E, Oppenheimer S J, Ismail A B, Ong K H
Department of Paediatrics and Microbiology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan.
Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jul;19(1):172-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.1.172.
A dot enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using 50-kD outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) of Salmonella typhi was compared with the Widal test for the serodiagnosis of typhoid fever in 109 febrile children admitted to a hospital in an endemic area. In the culture-positive typhoid group, the initial dot EIA was positive in 40 of 42 cases and the initial Widal test was positive in 41. In the culture-negative clinical typhoid group, both the dot EIA and the Widal test were positive in 17 of 18 cases. In the nontyphoidal fever group, the dot EIA was negative in all of 49 cases and the Widal test was negative in 44. With culture used as the gold standard, the dot EIA is as sensitive as the Widal test (95% vs. 98%), has a similar high negative predictive value (96% vs. 98%), and is more specific (75% vs. 67%). In addition, the dot EIA offers the advantages of simplicity, speed, early diagnosis, economy, and flexibility (i.e., other diagnostic tests can be conducted simultaneously).
采用伤寒沙门氏菌50-kD外膜蛋白(OMPs)的斑点酶免疫测定(EIA)与肥达试验,对某流行地区一家医院收治的109例发热儿童进行伤寒热的血清学诊断比较。在培养阳性的伤寒组中,42例中有40例初次斑点EIA呈阳性,初次肥达试验有41例呈阳性。在培养阴性的临床伤寒组中,18例中有17例斑点EIA和肥达试验均呈阳性。在非伤寒热组中,49例全部斑点EIA为阴性,44例肥达试验为阴性。以培养作为金标准,斑点EIA与肥达试验敏感性相同(分别为95%和98%),具有相似的高阴性预测值(分别为96%和98%),且更具特异性(分别为75%和67%)。此外,斑点EIA具有操作简单、速度快、能早期诊断、经济及灵活(即能同时进行其他诊断试验)的优点。