Enderlin G, Morales L, Jacobs R F, Cross J T
Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72202-3591.
Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jul;19(1):42-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.1.42.
Because of the recent lack of availability of streptomycin--currently considered the drug of choice for the treatment of tularemia--we reviewed the literature on alternative drugs that have been used for this purpose. In addition, we reviewed data on the in vitro susceptibility of Francisella tularensis to a wide variety of agents. The rate of cure for streptomycin was 97%, with no relapses. For gentamicin and tetracycline, respectively, the rates of cure were 86% and 88%, the rates of relapse were 6% and 12%, and the rates of failure were 8% and 0. The duration of therapy with gentamicin and a delay in its initiation may have affected outcome in severe cases. For chloramphenicol and tobramycin, cure rates were 77% and 50%, respectively; relapse rates were 21% and 0; and failure rates were 2% and 33%, respectively. Treatment with imipenem/cilastatin was successful in one case, and that with ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin was successful in six cases; in contrast, therapy with ceftriaxone was ineffective in eight cases. On the basis of this review, we conclude that gentamicin is an acceptable alternative to streptomycin for the treatment of tularemia.
由于近期链霉素供应不足(目前链霉素被视为治疗兔热病的首选药物),我们查阅了关于曾用于此目的的替代药物的文献。此外,我们还查阅了土拉热弗朗西斯菌对多种药物的体外药敏数据。链霉素的治愈率为97%,无复发情况。庆大霉素和四环素的治愈率分别为86%和88%,复发率分别为6%和12%,失败率分别为8%和0。在重症病例中,庆大霉素的治疗疗程及开始治疗的延迟可能影响了治疗结果。氯霉素和妥布霉素的治愈率分别为77%和50%;复发率分别为21%和0;失败率分别为2%和33%。亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗1例成功,环丙沙星或诺氟沙星治疗6例成功;相比之下,头孢曲松治疗8例无效。基于本综述,我们得出结论,庆大霉素是治疗兔热病时链霉素可接受的替代药物。