• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An automated Computerized Severity Index.一种自动化的计算机化严重程度指数。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:332-6.
2
Linking the Computerized Severity Index (CSI) to coded patient findings in the HELP system patient database.将计算机化严重程度指数(CSI)与HELP系统患者数据库中的编码患者检查结果相链接。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:673-7.
3
Lessons from evaluating an automated patient severity index.评估自动患者严重程度指数的经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Sep-Oct;3(5):349-57. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.97035026.
4
Micro-mainframe-like personal clinical research system.类微型主机个人临床研究系统。
J Med Syst. 1991 Jun;15(3):221-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00996551.
5
Hardware issues in the movement to computer-based patient records.向基于计算机的患者记录系统转变过程中的硬件问题。
Health Data Manag. 1995 Feb;3(2):45-8, 50, 54.
6
A new approach to the implementation of direct care-provider order entry.一种实施直接护理提供者医嘱录入的新方法。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:689-93.
7
University of Iowa webergizes its mainframe system.
Healthc Inform. 1997 Oct;14(10):25.
8
The impact of the HELP computer system on the LDS Hospital paper medical record.HELP计算机系统对LDS医院纸质病历的影响。
Top Health Rec Manage. 1991 Aug;12(1):1-9.
9
Innovations and research review: the impact of the HELP computer system on the LDS Hospital paper medical record.创新与研究综述:HELP计算机系统对LDS医院纸质病历的影响
Top Health Rec Manage. 1991 Nov;12(2):76-85.
10
Information resources assessment of a healthcare integrated delivery system.医疗综合交付系统的信息资源评估
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:525-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and efficiency of an automated system for calculating APACHE II scores in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房中用于计算急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)分数的自动化系统的准确性和效率。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:131-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units.重症监护病房死亡率和住院时间的差异。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 May 15;118(10):753-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-10-199305150-00001.
2
The HELP system.HELP系统。
J Med Syst. 1983 Apr;7(2):87-102. doi: 10.1007/BF00995116.
3
Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.kappa统计量的误解与误用。
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161.
4
A primer on MedisGroups.MedisGroups入门指南。
Pa Med. 1989 Jan;92(1):28-33.
5
Using severity information for quality assessment: a review of three cases by five severity measures.利用严重程度信息进行质量评估:五项严重程度指标对三个案例的回顾
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Dec;15(12):376-82. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30320-7.
6
Predicting in-hospital survival of myocardial infarction. A comparative study of various severity measures.
Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9):762-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199009000-00006.
7
The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)。危重症成年住院患者医院死亡率的风险预测。
Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619.
8
The relationship between severity of illness and hospital length of stay and mortality.
Med Care. 1991 Apr;29(4):305-17. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199104000-00001.
9
Admission and mid-stay MedisGroups scores as predictors of hospitalization charges.入院时和住院中期的MedisGroups评分作为住院费用的预测指标。
Med Care. 1991 Mar;29(3):210-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199103000-00003.
10
Measuring severity of illness: six severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations.疾病严重程度的衡量:六种严重程度系统及其解释成本差异的能力。
Inquiry. 1991 Spring;28(1):39-55.

一种自动化的计算机化严重程度指数。

An automated Computerized Severity Index.

作者信息

Gibson R F, Haug P J

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, LDS Hospital/University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:332-6.

PMID:7949945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2247850/
Abstract

The Computerized Severity Index (CSI) is a commercially available scoring system for hospital inpatients. Trained abstractors review the patient's paper medical record and enter the diagnoses and relevant physiological attributes. The HELP (Health Evaluation through Logical Processing) System at LDS Hospital stores patient data in discrete codes. This paper describes the development of an automatic interface between the standalone, personal-computer-based severity system and the mainframe-based hospital information system. The interface scores patient severity without the need for manual chart review. Severity scores from the automated and manual methods were identical for 70% of 222 general medical patients scored retrospectively. An evaluation of the causes for differing scores between the two methods is presented.

摘要

计算机化严重程度指数(CSI)是一种可供医院住院患者使用的商业评分系统。经过培训的摘要提取人员会查阅患者的纸质病历,并录入诊断结果和相关生理特征。LDS医院的HELP(通过逻辑处理进行健康评估)系统以离散代码形式存储患者数据。本文描述了一个基于独立个人计算机的严重程度系统与基于大型机的医院信息系统之间自动接口的开发。该接口无需人工查阅病历即可对患者的严重程度进行评分。对222名普通内科患者进行回顾性评分时,自动评分方法和人工评分方法得出的严重程度评分在70%的患者中是相同的。本文还对两种方法评分不同的原因进行了评估。