Botash A S, Babuts D, Mitchell N, O'Hara M, Lynch L, Manuel J
Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Dec;148(12):1282-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170120044007.
To review the findings of interdisciplinary team evaluations of children who disclosed sexual abuse via facilitated communication.
Case series.
Tertiary care hospital outpatient child sexual abuse program in central New York.
Between January 1990 and March 1993, 13 children who disclosed sexual abuse via facilitated communication and were referred to a university hospital child abuse referral and evaluation center. The range of previously determined developmental diagnosis included mental retardation, speech delay, and autism.
None.
Medical records were reviewed for (1) disclosure, (2) physical evidence, (3) child's behavioral and medical history, (4) disclosures by siblings, (5) perpetrator's confession, (6) child protective services determinations, and (7) court findings.
Four children had evidence of sexual abuse: two had physical findings consistent with sexual abuse, one also disclosed the allegation verbally, and one perpetrator confessed.
These results neither support nor refute validation of facilitated communication. However, many children had other evidence of sexual abuse, suggesting that each child's case should be evaluated without bias.
回顾通过辅助沟通披露性虐待的儿童的多学科团队评估结果。
病例系列。
纽约中部的三级护理医院门诊儿童性虐待项目。
1990年1月至1993年3月期间,13名通过辅助沟通披露性虐待并被转诊至大学医院儿童虐待转诊与评估中心的儿童。先前确定的发育诊断范围包括智力迟钝、语言发育迟缓及自闭症。
无。
审查病历以获取(1)披露情况、(2)身体证据、(3)儿童的行为和病史、(4)兄弟姐妹的披露情况、(5)犯罪者的供述、(6)儿童保护服务机构的判定以及(7)法庭调查结果。
4名儿童有性虐待证据:2名有与性虐待相符的身体检查结果,1名还通过言语披露了指控,1名犯罪者供认不讳。
这些结果既不支持也不反驳辅助沟通的有效性验证。然而,许多儿童有性虐待的其他证据,表明应对每个儿童的案件进行无偏见评估。