Suh Y O
Kanhohak Tamgu. 1994;3(1):93-113; discussion 114-5.
This comparative survey research was conducted to compare the relationship between health promotion lifestyles, self-esteem, health locus of control and health perception for employed and unemployed women. The sample consisted of 58 employed women and 63 unemployed women residing in Seoul and over 35 years old. The tool used for this study was a structured questionnaire which was revised by the researcher. The tool consisted of 8 items related to demographic characteristics, 47 items on health promotion lifestyle profile, 10 items on self-esteem measurement, 18 items on health locus of control, 21 items on health perception questionnaire. The data collected from the interviews were analyzing using SPSS, yielding frequencies, percentiles, means, standard deviations, t-test, x2-test, Pearson's product moment correlation. The result of this study are as follows: 1) The demograpic variables for the two groups were homogenous except for age. 2) No significance differences were found between the two groups on the health promotion lifestyle (t = -.06, p = .954), but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on 2 subscale (self actualization and nutrition) of the health promotion lifestyle. Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups for the employed women showed that the highest score was for nutrition, then self actualization, interpersonal support, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. For the unemployed women, the highest score was for nutrition, then interpersonal support, self actualization, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. 3) There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the self-esteem, employed women had lower score on self-esteem than unemployed women (t = -3.37, p = .001). 4) The result of the comparison between the two groups were significantly different for future health status, employed women (mean 3.57) had higher scores than unemployed women (mean 3.25) (t = 2.14, p = .034). 5) Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups showed that the highest score was for internal health locus of control, but there was a statistically no significant difference. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the external health locus of control (t = -3.90, p = .000).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本比较性调查研究旨在比较在职和失业女性的健康促进生活方式、自尊、健康控制点和健康认知之间的关系。样本包括58名居住在首尔且年龄超过35岁的在职女性和63名失业女性。本研究使用的工具是由研究者修订的结构化问卷。该工具包括8项与人口统计学特征相关的内容、47项关于健康促进生活方式概况的内容、10项关于自尊测量的内容、18项关于健康控制点的内容、21项关于健康认知问卷的内容。从访谈中收集的数据使用SPSS进行分析,得出频率、百分位数、均值、标准差、t检验、卡方检验、皮尔逊积差相关。本研究结果如下:1)除年龄外,两组的人口统计学变量具有同质性。2)两组在健康促进生活方式方面无显著差异(t = -.06,p = .954),但在健康促进生活方式的两个子量表(自我实现和营养)上两组存在统计学显著差异。比较两组在职女性得分顺序显示,得分最高的是营养,然后依次是自我实现、人际支持、压力管理、健康责任和锻炼。对于失业女性,得分最高的是营养,然后依次是人际支持、自我实现、压力管理、健康责任和锻炼。3)两组在自尊方面存在统计学显著差异,在职女性的自尊得分低于失业女性(t = -3.37,p = .001)。4)两组在未来健康状况比较结果上存在显著差异,在职女性(均值3.57)得分高于失业女性(均值3.25)(t = 2.14,p = .034)。5)两组得分顺序比较显示,得分最高的是内控健康控制点,但在统计学上无显著差异。然而,两组在外控健康控制点上存在统计学显著差异(t = -3.90,p = .000)。(摘要截选至400字)