Mohler J L, Figlesthaler W M, Zhang X Z, Partin A W, Maygarden S J
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill 27599-7235.
Cancer. 1994 Dec 1;74(11):2996-3001. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941201)74:11<2996::aid-cncr2820741117>3.0.co;2-9.
Nuclear shape analysis of histologic sections from radical prostatectomy specimens has retrospectively predicted outcome in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. If outcome could be predicted preoperatively by nuclear shape analysis, patients might be selected better for definitive surgical therapy. Morphometric analysis of preoperative biopsies, however, has not correlated positively with values obtained from analysis of prostatectomy specimens.
The nuclear shapes of histologic specimens of 20 organ-confined carcinomas, 10 periprostatic fat-invasive carcinomas, 10 seminal vesicle-invasive carcinomas, and 12 lymph node-metastatic carcinomas from 52 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease were evaluated.
Nuclei from areas of extraprostatic invasion or regional lymph node metastases were less round than those from the corresponding intraprostatic portion of the tumor (nuclear roundness factor (mean +/- SD) PPF, 51.2 +/- 3.1 vs. 31.2 +/- 3.2; SV, 52.4 +/- 4.1 vs. 31.6 +/- 2.5; and LN, 57.3 +/- 3.1 vs. 36.4 +/- 1.8; paired Student's t tests, P < 0.001). Cells sampled from the periphery of organ-confined tumors had a greater nuclear roundness factor (49.1 +/- 1.5) than did those sampled from the center (34.5 +/- 2.0; P < 0.001) or randomly throughout the tumor (37.8 +/- 1.6; P < 0.001). Nuclear roundness factors for all extraprostatic tumor foci and for peripheral tumor cells in organ-confined disease were similar (analysis of variance, P > 0.05). The intraprostatic portions of randomly sampled primary tumors had similar nuclear roundness factors, regardless of pathologic stage (P > 0.05). Among organ-confined carcinomas, nuclear shape was unrelated to tumor volume.
Pathologic stage in clinically localized prostate carcinoma cannot be determined by the nuclear shape profiles of intraprostatic tumor cells. Thus, patients with a poor prognosis or high pathologic stage can be recognized only when samples for morphometric analysis include high proportions of nuclei from the extra-prostatic carcinoma and nuclei from the periphery of organ-confined carcinoma that may not be sampled routinely by prostate biopsy.
根治性前列腺切除标本组织切片的核形态分析已回顾性地预测了临床局限性前列腺癌患者的预后。如果能通过核形态分析术前预测预后,那么患者或许能更好地被选择接受确定性手术治疗。然而,术前活检的形态计量分析与前列腺切除标本分析所得的值并无正相关。
评估了52例因临床局限性疾病接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的20例器官局限性癌、10例前列腺周围脂肪浸润性癌、10例精囊浸润性癌和12例淋巴结转移性癌的组织学标本的核形态。
前列腺外浸润区域或区域淋巴结转移灶的细胞核比肿瘤相应前列腺内部分的细胞核更不圆(核圆度因子(均值±标准差),PPF为51.2±3.1对31.2±3.2;SV为52.4±4.1对31.6±2.5;LN为57.3±3.1对36.4±1.8;配对t检验,P<0.001)。从器官局限性肿瘤周边取样的细胞比从肿瘤中心(34.5±2.0;P<0.001)或肿瘤内随机取样(37.8±1.6;P<0.001)的细胞具有更大的核圆度因子。所有前列腺外肿瘤灶以及器官局限性疾病中周边肿瘤细胞的核圆度因子相似(方差分析,P>0.05)。随机取样的原发性肿瘤的前列腺内部分具有相似的核圆度因子,与病理分期无关(P>0.05)。在器官局限性癌中,核形态与肿瘤体积无关。
临床局限性前列腺癌的病理分期无法通过前列腺内肿瘤细胞核的形态轮廓来确定。因此,只有当形态计量分析样本中包含高比例的来自前列腺外癌的细胞核以及来自器官局限性癌周边可能未被前列腺活检常规取样的细胞核时,才能识别出预后不良或病理分期高的患者。