Papademetriou V
Department of Veterans Affairs, Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422.
Cardiology. 1994;84 Suppl 2:43-7. doi: 10.1159/000176456.
Ventricular arrhythmias pose a serious risk in patients with high blood pressure. The concept that diuretics predispose to life-threatening arrhythmias, however, was originally based solely on observations made in patients with severe congestive heart failure pretreated with digitalis and not in patients with high blood pressure. In hypertensive patients, some studies have also indicated that diuretic therapy may be associated with an increase in premature ventricular beats, though most have failed to demonstrate a conclusive link between hypokalemia and the precipitation of such cardiac arrhythmias. Prospective studies, however, have demonstrated that diuretic therapy had no effect on the incidence of serious ventricular arrhythmias in hypertensive patients whether they had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or not, and neither at rest nor during or immediately following dynamic exercise. Correction of diuretic-induced hypokalemia similarly had no effect on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. In hypertensive patients, LVH is an independent and particularly sinister risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and its regression is now a specific goal of antihypertensive therapy. Diuretics have been shown to be at least as effective in that respect as other antihypertensive agents. The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group reported that after 2 years of treatment, only hydrochlorothiazide of 6 antihypertensive regimens resulted in significant reduction of left ventricular mass. In the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study, all the antihypertensive drugs used resulted in reductions in LVH but the diuretic caused a significantly greater reduction than other non-diuretic agents. In the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Study, which primarily used diuretics, there was a significant reduction in LVH at 5 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
室性心律失常在高血压患者中构成严重风险。然而,利尿剂易引发危及生命的心律失常这一概念最初仅基于对重度充血性心力衰竭患者(预先使用洋地黄治疗)的观察,而非高血压患者。在高血压患者中,一些研究还表明利尿剂治疗可能与室性早搏增加有关,尽管大多数研究未能证明低钾血症与此类心律失常的发生之间存在确凿联系。然而,前瞻性研究表明,利尿剂治疗对高血压患者严重室性心律失常的发生率没有影响,无论他们是否有左心室肥厚(LVH),在静息状态下、动态运动期间或运动后即刻均无影响。纠正利尿剂引起的低钾血症同样对室性心律失常的发生率没有影响。在高血压患者中,LVH是心血管发病和死亡的一个独立且特别凶险的危险因素,其逆转现在是抗高血压治疗的一个具体目标。利尿剂在这方面已被证明至少与其他抗高血压药物一样有效。退伍军人管理局合作研究小组报告称,经过2年治疗,6种抗高血压方案中只有氢氯噻嗪导致左心室质量显著降低。在轻度高血压治疗研究中,所有使用的抗高血压药物都使LVH有所降低,但利尿剂导致的降低幅度明显大于其他非利尿剂药物。在主要使用利尿剂的老年收缩期高血压研究中,5年后LVH有显著降低。(摘要截短至250字)