Pellegrino T R
Department of Neurology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1994 Nov;12(4):925-39.
The patient with an apparent first seizure presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the emergency department or primary care physician. Proper management of these patients requires a systematic diagnostic evaluation and assessment of the risks and benefits of treatment. Such an assessment requires that the following issues be addressed: Was the attack truly a seizure? Was this seizure truly the first seizure for this patient? Why did the seizure occur? Was the seizure a symptom of an acute neurologic or medical illness, a remote neurologic injury, or did the attack occur without evident cause? How extensive (and expensive) should the diagnostic evaluation be? If a cause for the seizure is identified, is direct therapy available or necessary? What is the likelihood of a recurrent attack? Will treatment with anticonvulsant drugs significantly reduce the risk of subsequent seizures? What are the risks of anticonvulsant drug treatment? Is anticonvulsant drug therapy appropriate for this patient at this time? It should be clear from the preceding discussion that definitive answers to such questions are not possible. The clinical data are always incomplete and uncertain and sometimes erroneous. Considerable clinical judgment is always needed. Nonetheless, we can hope that conscientious, systematic assessment will lead to the best possible treatment for each of our patients.
首次出现明显癫痫发作的患者给急诊科医生或初级保健医生带来了诊断和治疗方面的挑战。对这些患者进行恰当管理需要系统的诊断评估以及对治疗风险和益处的评估。这样的评估需要解决以下问题:此次发作真的是癫痫发作吗?此次癫痫发作真的是该患者的首次发作吗?癫痫发作为何会发生?此次癫痫发作是急性神经系统或内科疾病、既往神经系统损伤的症状,还是发作时无明显病因?诊断评估应做到何种程度(以及花费多少)?如果确定了癫痫发作的病因,是否有直接可用或必要的治疗方法?再次发作的可能性有多大?使用抗惊厥药物治疗能否显著降低后续癫痫发作的风险?抗惊厥药物治疗有哪些风险?此时抗惊厥药物治疗对该患者是否合适?从上述讨论中应清楚地看出,无法对这类问题给出确切答案。临床数据总是不完整、不确定且有时有误的。始终需要相当的临床判断力。尽管如此,我们希望认真、系统的评估能为每位患者带来尽可能最佳的治疗。