Masoni A, Alboni P
G Ital Cardiol. 1976 Sep-Oct;6(5):812-20.
The authors discuss the aetiological, electrophysiologic and diagnostic problems pertinent to peripheric blocks. Using the current ECG and VCG tests, it is often difficult, and sometimes impossible, to identify the ventricular wall affected by the block, the intraparietal localization and the seat of the block. Purkinje fibres, junction or muscle fibres. Because of the scarcity of experimental data, some of the diagnostic-differentials exposed have more the feature of logical hypothesis than that of certainty. The commonly held concept that the peripheric blocks do not alter, but that the terminal phases of ventricular depolarization do, is confirmed. The initial phases can also be altered, in that the Purkinje-junction-muscular fibres may be damage even in the septum, while the large ducts of conduction remain undamaged. Several discrepancies found between the presence of electric patterns of septal necrosis and that of infarctions in autopic examinations can possibly be explained as peripheric blocks localized in the left septum.
作者们讨论了与外周阻滞相关的病因学、电生理学及诊断问题。运用当前的心电图和心向量图检测,常常难以,有时甚至不可能确定受阻滞影响的心室壁、壁内定位以及阻滞部位,即浦肯野纤维、交界区或肌纤维。由于实验数据匮乏,所阐述的一些诊断鉴别更多具有逻辑假设的特征而非确定性。外周阻滞不改变心室去极化的初始阶段,但会改变其终末阶段这一普遍观点得到了证实。初始阶段也可能被改变,因为即使在间隔中,浦肯野 - 交界区 - 肌纤维可能受损,而传导大通道仍未受损。在尸检中发现的间隔坏死电模式与梗死电模式之间的若干差异,可能可以解释为左间隔部位的外周阻滞。