Suppr超能文献

A paired comparison of dot blot hybridization and PCR amplification for HPV testing of cervical scrapes interpreted as CIN 1.

作者信息

Duggan M A, Inoue M, McGregor S E, Stuart G C, Morris S, Chang-Poon V, Schepansky A, Honore L

机构信息

Department of Pathology Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foothills Hospital, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1994;15(3):178-87.

PMID:7957322
Abstract

The rate of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) detection in CIN 1 lesions is quite variable for several reasons. Amongst these, the sensitivity level of the HPV detection system probably ranks supreme. The prevalence of HPV DNA in cervical scrape samples from 234 patients referred for colposcopic investigation of a CIN 1 lesion was compared using dot blot hybridization (DBH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Both methods were performed on the same patient sample so that determinants of HPV positivity other than the detection system could be controlled. Probes and primers to HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35, and consensus HPV primers were used. The overall HPV positivity rate was 24% using DBH and 70% using PCR. Identified types by DBH and PCR respectively were; HPV 6/11: 1% and 2%, HPV 16/18: 16% and 41%, and HPV 31/33/35: 7% and 14%. PCR detected unidentified types in 13%. Since PCR resulted in a 2.9 times higher HPV DNA detection rate, the choice of detection system has a major impact on the HPV status of cervical smears interpreted as CIN 1.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验