Jensen J D, Jensen L W, Madsen J K
Department of Nephrology and Medicine C, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital in Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46(4):333-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00194401.
The pharmacokinetics of recombinant human erythropoietin (RhEPO) were investigated after subcutaneous (s.c.) injection in the thigh and in the abdominal wall. Eleven healthy subjects, age 24.4 years (median), were studied. Each subject received two s.c. injections of 100 U.kg-1 RhEPO dissolved in 1 ml water: one injection in the thigh and another in the abdomen. Serum erythropoietin was measured regularly by radioimmunoassay until 144 h after each injection. The mean residence time was significantly longer after injection in the thigh than in the abdomen (32.7 vs 26.2 h). The estimated half-life of absorption was significantly longer after injection in the thigh than after abdominal application (14.9 vs 12.3 h). The estimated half-life of elimination was not significantly different (4.4 vs 4.8 h). The relative difference in the area under the curve between injection in the abdomen and the thigh in the same subject ranged from -36% to +68% but there was no significant difference in bioavailability. The peak concentration was not significantly different and appeared at around 10 h (Cmax thigh, 175 U.l-1 vs Cmax abdomen, 216 U.l-1). A twin-peak configuration of the concentration vs time curve with a significant second peak at 24 h was found after injection in the thigh but not after abdominal injection. In conclusion, the mean residence time was longer after administration in the thigh, probably due to delayed absorption, but bioavailability was not significantly different. Following injection in the thigh the concentration curve had two peaks. The differences may be due to regional variations in lymph flow and to physical activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在大腿和腹壁进行皮下注射后,对重组人促红细胞生成素(RhEPO)的药代动力学进行了研究。研究了11名健康受试者,年龄中位数为24.4岁。每位受试者接受两次皮下注射100 U·kg-1 RhEPO(溶于1 ml水中):一次注射在大腿,另一次注射在腹部。通过放射免疫分析法定期测量血清促红细胞生成素,直至每次注射后144小时。大腿注射后的平均驻留时间明显长于腹部注射(32.7小时对26.2小时)。大腿注射后的吸收半衰期估计明显长于腹部注射后(14.9小时对12.3小时)。消除半衰期估计无显著差异(4.4小时对4.8小时)。同一受试者腹部和大腿注射曲线下面积的相对差异范围为-36%至+68%,但生物利用度无显著差异。峰值浓度无显著差异,出现在约10小时左右(大腿Cmax为175 U·L-1,腹部Cmax为216 U·L-1)。大腿注射后发现浓度-时间曲线呈双峰形态,在24小时有一个明显的第二峰,而腹部注射后未出现。总之,大腿给药后的平均驻留时间较长,可能是由于吸收延迟,但生物利用度无显著差异。大腿注射后浓度曲线有两个峰。这些差异可能是由于淋巴流动的区域差异和身体活动所致。(摘要截短于250字)