• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性子宫切除术的外科吻合技术

Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.

作者信息

Fanning J, Hilgers R D, Palabrica C

机构信息

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62794.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Nov;55(2):179-84. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1274.

DOI:10.1006/gyno.1994.1274
PMID:7959281
Abstract

We developed a new technique for performing radical hysterectomy using surgical staplers. An endoscopic stapler was used to transect the uterosacral and cardinal ligaments and a roticulating stapler with absorbable staples was used to transect the vaginal cuff. Fifteen consecutive patients with primary stage IA2 or IB cervical carcinoma underwent class III radical hysterectomy using the new stapling technique and were compared to the previous 15 consecutive similarly staged patients who underwent class III radical hysterectomy by the traditional clamp, cut, and suture ligation technique. Median operative time for the stapler group was 3 hr (1.3-4 hr) versus 4.3 hr (2.5-5.8 hr) for the traditional technique (P = 0.0002). Estimated blood loss for the stapler technique was 650 ml (200-1200 ml) versus 1100 ml (450-2600 ml) for the traditional technique (P = 0.009). Three patients (20%) received transfusions in the stapler group versus 10 (67%) in the traditional group (P = 0.05). There was no difference in the rate of infections, venous thrombosis, lymphocysts, fistuli, bladder atony, or obstipation between the two groups. At a median follow up of 22 months, only one patient has recurred (from the traditional group). In conclusion, the surgical stapling technique of radical hysterectomy does not appear to adversely affect survival or increase complications while operative blood loss and operative time are significantly reduced.

摘要

我们研发了一种使用手术吻合器进行根治性子宫切除术的新技术。使用内镜吻合器横断子宫骶韧带和主韧带,并用带有可吸收钉的旋转式吻合器横断阴道断端。连续15例IA2期或IB期宫颈癌患者采用新的吻合技术接受了III类根治性子宫切除术,并与之前连续15例采用传统钳夹、切割和缝合结扎技术接受III类根治性子宫切除术的分期相似的患者进行比较。吻合器组的中位手术时间为3小时(1.3 - 4小时),而传统技术组为4.3小时(2.5 - 5.8小时)(P = 0.0002)。吻合器技术的估计失血量为650毫升(200 - 1200毫升),而传统技术组为1100毫升(450 - 2600毫升)(P = 0.009)。吻合器组有3例患者(20%)接受了输血,而传统组有10例(67%)(P = 0.05)。两组在感染、静脉血栓形成、淋巴囊肿、瘘管、膀胱无张力或便秘发生率方面无差异。中位随访22个月时,仅1例患者复发(来自传统组)。总之,根治性子宫切除术的手术吻合技术似乎不会对生存产生不利影响或增加并发症,同时手术失血量和手术时间显著减少。

相似文献

1
Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.根治性子宫切除术的外科吻合技术
Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Nov;55(2):179-84. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1274.
2
Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy: survival, recurrence, and late complications.根治性子宫切除术的外科吻合技术:生存率、复发率及晚期并发症
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Nov;79(2):281-3. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5948.
3
Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler.使用内镜吻合器的根治性子宫切除术。
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Oct;71(1):50-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5096.
4
A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术的多机构经验。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
5
Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device.
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):951-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051372.67213.ca.
6
Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.采用浦那技术的腹腔镜全子宫根治术:我们248例的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):682-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.007.
7
Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.腹式子宫切除术中阴道残端闭合:缝线与可吸收吻合器的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):415-8.
8
A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jun;93(3):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.003.
9
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的匹配对照研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec;95(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.055.
10
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.早期浸润性宫颈癌的全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(II-III型)加盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Vaginal Cuff Closure During Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: The Bruges Method.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术中的机器人阴道残端闭合术:布鲁日方法
Cureus. 2023 Nov 20;15(11):e49149. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49149. eCollection 2023 Nov.