Brewer C A, Chan J, Kurosaki T, Berman M L
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois 62794-1315, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Oct;71(1):50-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5096.
Morbidity associated with radical hysterectomy is significant. Utilizing the endoscopic stapler for transection of the cardinal ligaments and uterosacral ligaments is a possible method to decrease operative time and blood loss.
Two groups of patients, one group with the stapler used (n = 21) and the other with the traditional method utilized (n = 18), were compared in regard to operative and postoperative morbidity, operative time, and surgical margins. The groups were similar in regard to medical condition, age, and weight.
Median (243 min versus 284 min) and mean (246 min versus 287 min) operative times were significantly less in the stapler group than in the control group (P < 0.002). Median blood loss was reduced by 20% in the stapler group (400 ml versus 500 ml, P < 0.03). There was no significant difference in febrile morbidity, surgical complications, or length of hospital stay.
Our data suggest significant reduction in blood loss and operative time with the use of the endoscopic stapler.
根治性子宫切除术相关的发病率较高。使用内镜吻合器横断主韧带和子宫骶韧带是减少手术时间和失血的一种可行方法。
比较两组患者,一组使用吻合器(n = 21),另一组采用传统方法(n = 18),比较手术及术后发病率、手术时间和手术切缘。两组患者在病情、年龄和体重方面相似。
吻合器组的中位手术时间(243分钟对284分钟)和平均手术时间(246分钟对287分钟)显著短于对照组(P < 0.002)。吻合器组的中位失血量减少了20%(400毫升对500毫升,P < 0.03)。发热发病率、手术并发症或住院时间无显著差异。
我们的数据表明,使用内镜吻合器可显著减少失血和手术时间。