Erdelyi M H
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, CUNY, 11210.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1994 Oct;42(4):379-90. doi: 10.1080/00207149408409366.
Although a long tradition exists suggesting that hypnosis can enhance memory (hypnotic hypermnesia), the experimental literature is quite mixed. When, however, laboratory studies are classified according to the type of stimulus and memory tests employed, a remarkable orderliness of outcomes emerges: Recall tests for high-sense stimuli (e.g., poetry, meaningful pictures) almost always produce hypermnesia, but not recognition tests for low-sense stimuli (e.g., nonsense syllables, word lists). An important methodological issue is whether the recall increments for high-sense stimuli constitute enhanced memory or enhanced reporting (laxer response criteria). Recent laboratory literatures show that, beyond response criterion effects, true memory enhancement (hypermnesia) exists. Experiments conducted over the past decade, however, demonstrate that it is repeated retrieval effort and not hypnosis that is responsible for hypermnesia: Repeated testing without hypnosis yields as much hypermnesia as with hypnosis.
尽管长期以来一直有一种观点认为催眠可以增强记忆力(催眠性记忆增强),但实验文献的结果却参差不齐。然而,当根据所采用的刺激类型和记忆测试对实验室研究进行分类时,结果呈现出显著的规律性:对高感知觉刺激(如诗歌、有意义的图片)的回忆测试几乎总是会产生记忆增强现象,但对低感知觉刺激(如无意义音节、单词列表)的识别测试则不然。一个重要的方法学问题是,高感知觉刺激的回忆增量是构成了记忆增强还是报告增强(更宽松的反应标准)。最近的实验室文献表明,除了反应标准效应外,真正的记忆增强(记忆增强)是存在的。然而,过去十年进行的实验表明,导致记忆增强的是反复的检索努力而非催眠:无催眠状态下的重复测试与有催眠状态下产生的记忆增强效果一样多。