Pfitzenmeyer P, Guilland J C, d'Athis P, Petit-Marnier C, Gaudet M
Service de Médecine-Gériatrie, Dijon, France.
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1994;64(2):113-8.
This study compared the thiamine status of 35 elderly hospital inpatients with cardiac failure (CF) with that of 35 elderly inpatients with other diagnoses (Non-CF). The CF group was then randomly allocated to CF1 group (thiamine treatment, 200 mg per day for 7 days), and CF2 group (non supplemented). The effect of the thiamine treatment on the cardiac failure course was examined. Although there was no significant difference in thiamine status between CF and Non-CF groups, 11.5% of the first group against only 6.0% of the second was deficient with the thiamine pyrophosphate stimulation effect (TPPE) test. The same trend was observed, if NYHA functional assessment was taken into account, thiamine deficiency was more frequent in class 4 than in class 3. No significant difference for thiamin status was observed in patients receiving furosemide treatment and those without furosemide treatment. Although vitamin treatment permitted a significant improvement in thiamine status, the course of the cardiopathy was not significantly different in CF1 (supplemented) and CF2 (non supplemented) groups. Whether systematic thiamine supplementation is indicated in CF patients requires further investigation.
本研究比较了35例老年心力衰竭(CF)住院患者与35例患有其他疾病的老年住院患者(非CF)的硫胺素状态。然后将CF组随机分为CF1组(硫胺素治疗,每天200mg,共7天)和CF2组(不补充)。研究了硫胺素治疗对心力衰竭病程的影响。虽然CF组和非CF组之间的硫胺素状态没有显著差异,但在焦磷酸硫胺素刺激效应(TPPE)试验中,第一组有11.5%的患者缺乏硫胺素,而第二组只有6.0%。如果考虑纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能评估,也观察到相同的趋势,4级患者硫胺素缺乏比3级更常见。在接受呋塞米治疗的患者和未接受呋塞米治疗的患者中,硫胺素状态没有显著差异。虽然维生素治疗使硫胺素状态有显著改善,但CF1组(补充)和CF2组(不补充)的心脏病病程没有显著差异。CF患者是否需要系统性补充硫胺素需要进一步研究。