Crosignani P G, Walters D E
Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica I, Facolta di Medicina, Universita di Milano, Italy.
Hum Reprod. 1994 Jun;9(6):1112-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138642.
Ovulation induction alone, and ovulation induction in conjunction with one of four assisted procreation methods [intra-uterine insemination (IUI), intra-peritoneal insemination (IPI), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)] were tested as a treatment for male infertility in a prospective randomized trial. The trial when completed had generated data on 499 cycles from 346 patients. There was overwhelming evidence that some form of assisted procreation was beneficial, when compared to the spontaneous natural conception rate, which is generally assumed to be between 0.01 and 0.02 for male infertility. There was also firm evidence that IUI, GIFT or IVF (mean per cycle pregnancy rate 0.212) were superior to the remaining two treatments of IPI and ovulation induction alone (mean per cycle pregnancy rate 0.068). Duration of infertility and a diagnosis of endometriosis were the most important (adverse) pre-treatment factors detected.
在一项前瞻性随机试验中,对单独进行促排卵以及将促排卵与四种辅助生殖方法之一(宫内人工授精(IUI)、腹腔内人工授精(IPI)、配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)或体外受精(IVF))相结合作为男性不育症的治疗方法进行了测试。试验完成时,已收集了346例患者499个周期的数据。与自然受孕率相比,有压倒性的证据表明某种形式的辅助生殖是有益的,男性不育症的自然受孕率通常假定在0.01至0.02之间。也有确凿的证据表明,IUI、GIFT或IVF(每个周期平均妊娠率0.212)优于IPI和单独促排卵这两种剩余治疗方法(每个周期平均妊娠率0.068)。不育持续时间和子宫内膜异位症诊断是检测到的最重要的(不利)治疗前因素。