• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十二年及超过30000例由助产护士接生的分娩:洛杉矶县+南加州大学妇女医院分娩中心的经验。

Twelve years and more than 30,000 nurse-midwife-attended births: the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California women's hospital birth center experience.

作者信息

Greulich B, Paine L L, McClain C, Barger M K, Edwards N, Paul R

机构信息

Nurse-Midwifery Service, Women's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90033.

出版信息

J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Jul-Aug;39(4):185-96. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90025-6.

DOI:10.1016/0091-2182(94)90025-6
PMID:7965188
Abstract

This article describes the setting, policies, practices, and outcomes of the nurse-managed in-hospital birth center at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Women's Hospital, where women are selected upon admission for birth center care. A retrospective review of available data was made; when compared with hospital records, the primary data source was found to be 96% accurate. Results of the review indicated that from 1981 to 1992, there were 36,410 birth center admissions and 30,311 births, all attended by nurse-midwives; no intrapartum maternal or fetal deaths occurred among all admissions. The intrapartum transfer rate averaged 17%, and declined steadily from a high of 28% in 1982 to a low of 7% in 1990. More in-depth review showed an overall primary cesarean birthrate of 1.8% and an operative birthrate of 4% among the 25,890 admissions and 22,490 births from 1985 to 1992. Detailed postpartum and newborn outcomes from 1982 to 1986 showed a neonatal intensive care unit admission rate of 1.5% and a one-week newborn readmission rate of 1.3% among newborns discharged within 12 to 24 hours; 85% of all newborns returned for follow-up care. This large longitudinal experience demonstrates excellent outcomes that can be achieved when nurse-midwives, working cooperatively with a multidisciplinary health care team, provide in-hospital birth center care to a predominately low-income Hispanic population using a variety of less-traditional intrapartum management techniques. Broader implications for making alternative maternity care services available for low-income women with nurse-midwives and nurses playing a central role are discussed.

摘要

本文描述了洛杉矶县+南加州大学妇女医院由护士管理的院内分娩中心的环境、政策、实践和成果,该分娩中心在产妇入院时挑选适合在中心接受护理的女性。对现有数据进行了回顾性分析;与医院记录相比,主要数据源的准确率达96%。分析结果表明,1981年至1992年期间,分娩中心共接收36410名产妇,分娩30311例,均由助产士接生;所有入院产妇中未发生产时孕产妇或胎儿死亡。产时转诊率平均为17%,从1982年的28%的高位稳步下降至1990年的7%的低位。更深入的分析显示,在1985年至1992年的25890例入院产妇和22490例分娩中,总体剖宫产率为1.8%,手术分娩率为4%。1982年至1986年详细的产后和新生儿结局显示,在12至24小时内出院的新生儿中,新生儿重症监护病房入住率为1.5%,一周内新生儿再次入院率为1.3%;85%的新生儿接受了后续护理。这一大型纵向研究经验表明,当助产士与多学科医疗团队合作,运用各种不太传统的产时管理技术,为主要是低收入的西班牙裔人群提供院内分娩中心护理时,可以取得出色的成果。文中还讨论了让低收入女性能够获得替代性产妇护理服务的更广泛意义,其中助产士和护士发挥核心作用。

相似文献

1
Twelve years and more than 30,000 nurse-midwife-attended births: the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California women's hospital birth center experience.十二年及超过30000例由助产护士接生的分娩:洛杉矶县+南加州大学妇女医院分娩中心的经验。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Jul-Aug;39(4):185-96. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90025-6.
2
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
3
Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.北美医院中护士作为分娩支持提供者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Sep 18;288(11):1373-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1373.
4
A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.伙伴关系模式下的助产士护理与传统团队助产士护理的比较:分娩及产程结局
Midwifery. 2001 Sep;17(3):234-40. doi: 10.1054/midw.2001.0257.
5
Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.医院层面助产士接生比例与产科手术利用情况之间的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院——时间、频率、原因、紧迫性及结果:评估产科单位研究的一部分
Midwifery. 2015 Sep;31(9):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.美国16924例计划在家分娩的护理结局:北美助产士联盟统计项目,2004年至2009年
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12172. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省由助产士接生与由医生接生的计划内医院分娩结局比较。
Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00160.x.
9
The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.体重至少4500克的巨大儿结局:洛杉矶县+南加州大学的经验
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;85(4):558-64. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00005-C.
10
Rural community birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes for planned community births among rural women in the United States, 2004-2009.农村社区分娩:2004 - 2009年美国农村妇女计划在社区分娩的孕产妇和新生儿结局
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):120-129. doi: 10.1111/birt.12322. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing normal birth: organizations, goals, and research.推动正常分娩:组织、目标与研究
J Perinat Educ. 2005 Spring;14(2):40-8. doi: 10.1624/105812405X44727.
2
Characteristics of current hospital-sponsored and nonhospital birth centers.当前医院资助的和非医院分娩中心的特点。
Matern Child Health J. 1997 Jun;1(2):89-99. doi: 10.1023/a:1026270306793.
3
Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.美国的助产护理、社会及医学风险因素与分娩结局
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):310-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310.